14 50(14)Mr. Acosta Calderón was transferred to the Rehabilitation Center of Ambato. On July 27, 1990, Mr. Acosta Calderón requested that his imprisonment order be revoked and that he be transferred to the city of Tena.20 50(15)On August 20, 1990, the Judge of Criminal Matters of Lake Agrio ordered that what was stated in its court order of May 18, 1990 (supra para. 50(12)) be complied with in what referred to establishing the location of the physical evidence seized from Mr. Acosta Calderón was located.21 50(16)On September 13, 1990 the Judge of Criminal Matters of Lake Agrio stated that the reversal of the imprisonment ordered requested by Mr. Acosta Calderón on July 27, 1990 (supra para. 50(14)) did not proceed, since his “legal situation” had not changed. Also, the Judge of Criminal Matters of Lake Agrio ordered that what was stated in the court orders of May 18, 1990 (supra para. 50(12)) and of August 20, 1990 (supra para. 50(15)) be complied with in order to proceed with the requirements established in Article 10 of the Law on the Control of the Trafficking of Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances and its Regulations.22 50(17)On October 3, 1990 the Judge of Criminal Matters of Lake Agrio ordered that what was stated in the court orders of May 18, 1990 (supra para. 50(12)), August 20, 1990 (supra para. 50(15)), and September 13, 1990 (supra para. 50(16)) be complied with in order to establish the whereabouts of the physical evidence seized from Mr. Acosta Calderón. In this order, the Secretary of the Court stated that the previous Secretary of the Court did not give him the inventory of criminal cases, nor did he inform him of where the physical evidence of the processes was located.23 50(18)On October 10, 1990 the Director of the Social Rehabilitation Center of Tena informed the Judge of Criminal Matters of Lake Agrio that Mr. Acosta Calderón had been transferred from that center to the Social Rehabilitation Center of Ambato.24 50(19)On November 27, 1990 the Judge of Criminal Matters of Lake Agrio once again ordered that what was stated in the court orders of May 18, 1990 (supra para. 50(12)), August 20, 1990 (supra para. 50(15)), September 13, 1990 (supra para. 50(16)), and October 3, 1990 (supra para. 50(17)) be complied with in order to establish the whereabouts of the physical evidence seized from Mr. Acosta Calderón. They also ordered that the Secretary of the Court get in contact with the previous Secretary of the Court so that the latter could respond 20 Cfr. defense brief of July 27, 1990 presented by Mr. Acosta Calderón to the Criminal Judge of Lake Agrio (dossier of annexes to the petition, annex 10, leaf 121). 21 Cfr. ruling of August 20, 1990 issued by the Criminal Judge of Lake Agrio (dossier of annexes to the petition, annex 10, leaf 122). 22 Cfr. ruling of September 13, 1990 issued by the Criminal Judge of Lake Agrio (dossier of annexes to the petition, annex 10, leaf 124). 23 Cfr. ruling of October 3, 1990 issued by the Criminal Judge of Lake Agrio (dossier of annexes to the petition, annex 10, leaf 126). 24 Cfr. official letter of October 10, 1990 addressed by the Director of the Social Rehabilitation Center of Tena to the Criminal Judge of Lake Agrio (dossier of annexes to the petition, annex 10, leaf 127).

Seleccionar párrafo de destino3