22 Police Report Nº 049-DIVICOTE 3-DINCOTE of February 25, 1993; statement of María Elena Loayza-Tamayo of February 15, 1993, to DINCOTE; testimony of Juan Alberto Delgadillo-Castañeda, Luis Guzmán-Casas, and Luis Alberto CantoralBenavides of December 11, 1996; testimony of María Elena Loayza-Tamayo of December 12, 1996; testimony of Víctor Alvarez-Pérez of February 5, 1997, and expert opinion of León Carlos Arslanian of February 5, 1997; application; answer to the application); she was unable to exercise her right to file an action for the safeguard of her personal liberty, or to question the lawfulness or arbitrariness of her arrest (cf. Decree-Laws Nº 25.475 (crime of terrorism), and Nº 25.659 (crime of treason)). d. That Ms. María Elena Loayza-Tamayo, together with other persons, was exhibited publicly through the media wearing "prison stripes", and introduced as a terrorist, although she had been neither tried nor convicted (cf. Article in the daily newspaper "La República" of Lima, Peru, entitled, "Fourteen Senderistas who killed eight soldiers and dynamited two police stations are apprehended," of February 27, 1993, and videotape produced as evidence by the Commission). e. That Ms. María Elena Loayza-Tamayo was not allowed to communicate with her family while she was held incommunicado at DINCOTE, and during that period she was examined by a doctor, who diagnosed ecchymosis (cf. Testimony of María Elena Loayza-Tamayo of December 12, 1996; copy of detailed medical certificate Nº 5323-L of February 8, 1993; official communication Nº 3623-94 MP-FN of November 19, 1994, and official communication Nº 3064-94 MP-FN of November 8, 1994). f. That Ms. María Elena Loayza-Tamayo was tried -together with other defendants in a cumulative trial- for the crime of treason in the military courts; that on February 25, 1993, Police File Nº 049-DIVICOTE 3-DINCOTE was opened for that crime; that she was subsequently brought for trial before the Special Naval Court and, by decision of that Court, was released, was held at the Army Veterinary Hospital from February 27 to March 3, 1993; on March 5, 1993 she was acquitted by the Special Naval Court; on April 2, 1993, she was convicted by the Special Naval Court Martial; on August 11, 1993, she was acquitted of the crime of treason by the Special Tribunal of the Supreme Council of Military Justice, and on September 24, 1993, the Full Chamber of the Special Supreme Military Tribunal upheld Ms. María Elena Loayza-Tamayo's acquittal; that the proceedings were summary (cf. Police Report Nº 049-DIVICOTE 3-DINCOTE of February 25, 1993; judgment of March 5, 1993, of the Special Naval Court, judgment of April 2, 1993 of the Special Naval Court Martial; judgment of August 11, 1993, of the Special Tribunal of the Supreme Council of Military Justice; and judgment of September 24, 1993, of the Full Chamber of the Special Supreme Military Tribunal). g. That Ms. Loayza-Tamayo remained in detention from September 24, 1993, the date on which the Full Chamber of the Special Military Tribunal upheld her acquittal, until October 8 of that year, when she was bound over for trial in the civil courts (cf. judgment of September 24, 1993, of the Full Chamber of the Special Supreme Military Tribunal; ruling of the Forty-third Criminal Court of Lima of October 8, 1993, a closing for trial; testimony of María Elena Loayza-Tamayo of December 12, 1996; brief containing the Commission's application; brief containing the State's answer to the application; brief of closing arguments of the Commission, and the 1994 Report of the Task Force of the Government of Peru). h. That Ms. María Elena Loayza-Tamayo was later tried in the civil court system