163 elucidated promptly and for those responsible to be punished. case was one of those chosen; The instant n) a bill is now being discussed regarding public policy in the struggle against impunity for violations of human rights and international humanitarian law; o) the State is considering the appointment of a high commissioner for victims to coordinate and implement a comprehensive policy on reparations. It is also considering a plan to ensure representation of the victims in the criminal and administrative-law proceedings; to identify and remove obstacles that up to now have made said representation difficult; to further a plan to seek friendly settlements; to establish a trust fund for reparations to the victims in terms that are sufficient, effective, prompt, and proportional to the gravity of the violation and the type of injury suffered; p) the State highlights the policy of dialogue with the main groups outside the Law, as well as constant reduction of violence indicators. Democratic security does not deny the possibility of dialogue with illegal armed groups. In this regard, there is an ongoing dialogue process with the self-defense groups that began under the previous government, but subjecting them to conditions imposed by the current government, such as a cease-fire; and q) the State rejects the other parties’ considerations regarding the current peace process, as it is not a matter addressed by the American Convention, for which reason it cannot be subject to a ruling in a specific case. The administrative decision that formally begins a peace process has two main effects: it suspends the arrest warrants against representative members of the illegal armed groups, and it enables areas to be defined for relocation of those in arms, with a territorial effect on the arrest warrants, which are only suspended in that area, setting aside the status of members representing the men located there. The process of individual and collective demobilization is moving forward very successfully, expressing the spirit of and will for reconciliation and sustainability of the peace process. The country has understood that this public policy is a feasible, flexible, and rapid option for citizen reinsertion, resocialization and reconstruction. The State understands that there is no possibility of granting any type of legal benefits to persons who are being investigated for or have been convicted of atrocious crimes. Considerations of the Court 294. In this section, the Court will order measures of satisfaction to redress nonmaterial damages, those that are non-pecuniary, as well as measures that are public in their scope or repercussions.290 These measures are especially significant in the instant case due to the extreme gravity of the facts. 290 See Case of Acosta Calderón, supra note 7, para. 163; Case of the Moiwana Community, supra note 4, para. 201, and Case of Caesar, supra note 274, para. 129.