73 Ardila, as daughter of Sinaí Blanco Santamaría, eight hundred (800) gold grams. For Arbey Blanco Ardila, eight hundred (800) gold grams. For María Isabel Blanco, eight hundred (800) gold grams. Pecuniary damages for the death of Sinaí Blanco Santamaría. As recognition of the pecuniary damages to Blanca Lilia Ardila Castañeda, who acted as spouse of the deceased and taking into account the aforementioned circumstance with regard to the cases brought by Nory Giraldo de Jaramillo, we offer five million five hundred eleven thousand pesos ($5,511,000). No offer is made to recognize pecuniary damages to the children of Sinaí Blanco because they were not claimed in the application.133 96.131 Subsequently, the Administrative Court of Meta approved the Total Conciliatory Agreement of February 1, 2005 (supra para. 96.130), which “leads to res judicata” and concluded said proceeding. It also accepted the waiver of the claims in the application filed by Lilia Aurora Moreno Novoa and her son, minor Juan Carlos Florez Moreno, Adela Aydé Florez Moreno and Néstor Fernando Florez Moreno and Orlando Albeiro Florez Moreno.134 96.132 Nory Giraldo de Jaramillo stated that she did not wish to reach a settlement regarding the settlement proposal made by the State.135 Disciplinary Jurisdiction 96.133 A disciplinary proceeding with regard to the facts of July 1997 was opened before the Attorney General’s Office against several members of the Armed Forces and public officials. The facts investigated, until then, were, that members of the ‘Autodefensas Campesinas’ entered the departments of Guaviare and Meta […and] killed Rolan or Ronal Valencia, Sinaí Blanco, an unidentified male and Pacho NN; they kidnapped Antonio María Barrera Calle and Nelson N.N., whose whereabouts are unknown. At the Inspección de La Cooperativa they murdered Álvaro Tovar Muñoz, Jaime Pinzón, N.N. Morales, a male, and Teresa N.N. and an as yet not established number of individuals whose bodies were apparently thrown into the Guaviare River; ten people died […] without the civil and military authorities intervening in a timely way or acting in accordance with their functions.136 96.134 On April 24, 2001 the Deputy Attorney General decided: FIRST: To disciplinarily punish Brigadier General (r) Jaime Humberto Uscátegui Ramírez as Commander of the Seventh Brigade of the National Army, at the time of the facts under investigation, with ABSOLUTE SEPARATION FROM THE MILITARY FORCES, for having incurred in the disciplinary misconducts set forth in Decree 85 de 1989, Article 65, Section C, paragraph a); Section F, paragraph a); and Article 184, paragraph g) […]137 133 See February 2005 ruling by the Administrative Tribunal of Meta (file with evidence tendered by the State, pages 4772 to 4780). 134 See February 2005 ruling by the Administrative Tribunal of Meta (file with evidence tendered by the State, pages 4772 to 4780). 135 Non-disputed fact. 136 See disciplinary ruling of April 24, 2001 by the Deputy Public Prosecutor of the Nation (file with appendixes to the application, appendix 61, page 1007). 137 See Decree No. 85 of 1989 "Which amends the Rules of Procedure of the Disciplinary System of the Military Forces.” Article 65, Section C, “On negligence in command,” paragraph a), for having eluded the responsibility inherent to his role as commander, because according to Articles 12 and 13 of those Rules of Procedure, “Whoever is assigned a command function is competent to issue