33 Bulacio, and for violation of the same Articles 8 and 25 to the detriment of the next of kin of youth Walter David Bulacio, all of them in connection with Article 1(1) and 2 of the American Convention (supra 38). This Court has reiterated, in its case law, that it is a principle of International Law that any violation of an international obligation that has caused damage involves a new obligation: to adequately redress the damage caused.47 To this end, the Court has based itself on Article 63(1) of the American Convention, according to which, [i]f the Court finds that there has been a violation of a right or freedom protected by this Convention, the Court shall rule that the injured party be ensured the enjoyment of his right or freedom that was violated. It shall also rule, if appropriate, that the consequences of the measure or situation that constituted the breach of such right or freedom be remedied and that fair compensation be paid to the injured party (not underlined in the original text). 71. As this Court has stated before, Article 63(1) of the American Convention reflects a customary rule that is one of the fundamental principles of contemporary international law regarding the responsibility of States. When an illicit act attributable to a State takes place, it incurs an international responsibility for violation of the international rule, with the consequent duty of redressing and putting an end to the consequences of the violation.48 72. Reparation of the damage caused by breaching an international obligation requires, whenever feasible, full restitution (restitutio in integrum), which involves reestablishment of the situation before the violation. If this is not possible, as in the instant case, this international Court must order adoption of measures that, in addition to ensuring respect for the rights abridged, will remedy the consequences caused by the infractions, and for compensation to be paid for damage caused.49 The obligation to redress, which is regulated in all its aspects (scope, nature, modes 47 Cf., Juan Humberto Sánchez Case, supra note 4, para. 147; “Five Pensioners” Case, supra note 4, para. 173; Cantos Case, supra note 6, para. 66; El Caracazo Case, Reparations, supra note 5, para. 76; Hilaire, Constantine and Benjamin et al. Case, supra note 5, para. 202; Trujillo Oroza Case, Reparations, supra note 30, para. 60; Bámaca Velásquez Case, Reparations, supra note 30, para. 38; Cantoral Benavides Case, Reparations, supra note 30, para. 40; Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni Community Case, supra note 4, para. 163; Cesti Hurtado Case. Reparations, supra note 30, para. 32; “Street Children” Case (Villagrán Morales at al.). Reparations, supra note 30, para. 59; “White Van” Case (Paniagua Morales et al.). Reparations, supra note 30, para. 78; Ivcher Bronstein Case, supra note 30, para. 177; Baena Ricardo et al. Case, supra note 28, para. 201; Case of the Constitutional Court, supra note 30, para. 118; Suárez Rosero Case. Reparations (Art. 63(1) American Convention on Human Rights). January 20, 1999 Judgment. Series C No. 44, para. 40; Castillo Páez Case. Reparations, supra note 26, para. 50; Loayza Tamayo Case. Reparations (Art. 63.1 American Convention on Human Rights), November 27, 1998 Judgment. Series C No. 42, para. 84; Garrido and Baigorria Case. Reparations (Art. 63(1) American Convention on Human Rights). August 27, 1998 Judgment. Series C No. 39, para. 40; Caballero Delgado and Santana Case. Reparations (Art. 63(1) American Convention on Human Rights). January 29, 1997 Judgment. Series C No. 31, para. 15; Neira Alegría et al. Case. Reparations (Art. 63(1) American Convention on Human Rights). September 19, 1996 Judgment. Series C No. 29, para. 36; and El Amparo Case. Reparations (Art. 63(1) American Convention on Human Rights). September 14, 1996 Judgment. Series C No. 28, para. 14. 48 Cf., Juan Humberto Sánchez Case, supra note 4, para. 148; “Five Pensioners” Case, supra note 4, para. 174; and Cantos Case, supra note 6, para. 67. 49 Cf., Juan Humberto Sánchez Case, supra note 4, para. 149; Las Palmeras Case, Reparations, supra note 5, para. 38; and El Caracazo Case, Reparations, supra note 5, para. 77.