13 51. That with regard to the duty of the State to adopt the educational, work-related and other measures necessary to ensure the social readaptation of Mr. Raxcacó Reyes when he has served the sentence imposed (operative paragraph twelve of the Judgment), the State pointed out that the victim "is making handicrafts, in his own sector" and besides "he is not registered or enrolled in any academic activity.” 52. That the representatives made reference to the fact that “his family” provides Mr. Raxcacó with the materials he uses to make handicrafts and that “he was not allowed to enter in any educational program that may contribute to his social reeducation and readaptation.” 53. That the Commission pointed out that, “the educational and work-related measures are not being effectively implemented.” 54. That this President considers it is advisable to receive further information to establish the compliance with this aspect. * * * 55. That with regard to the publication of the Judgment (operative paragraph thirteen of the Judgment) the State informed that on September 22, 2006, the Diario de Centro America (Central American newspaper) and on March 28, 2007, the “El Periódico”, national newspaper, published the pertinent parts of the Judgment, respectively. 56. That the representatives pointed out that “the publications made by the State do not satisfy the requirements established [in] the [J]udgment" since "even though the paragraphs determined in the Judgment are literally published, there is no reference to the numbers of such paragraphs nor even the chapters to which they correspond.” 57. That the Commission noted, “with satisfaction the substantial compliance with the order delivered by the Court.” 58. That as is evident from the case file, the State has taken steps towards the compliance with this obligation, but it would be advisable to receive more information in order to establish compliance with this aspect. * * * 59. That with regard to the payment for reimbursement of expenses (operative paragraph fourteen of the Judgment), the State pointed out that on February 26, 2007, it delivered the sum of $5.000, 00 (five thousand dollars of the United States of America) in Guatemalan currency, according to the order delivered by the Court. 60. That the representatives submitted no further information in such regard. 61. That the Commission “took note of the fact that the State of Guatemala has complied with this obligation.” 62. That as is evident from the case file, the Court notes that the State has taken steps towards the compliance with this obligation, but that it would be advisable to receive further information. C) Regarding the request for extension of provisional measures