-14seen paragraph 2(e) and 2(f)), the Court considers it necessary that Argentina provide updated information on Mr. Alcaína’s situation and whether it knows his whereabouts. 16. That the State should take all necessary steps to ensure that the measures of protection decided in this Order are planned and implemented with the participation of the beneficiaries of the measures or their representatives, so that the said measures are provided diligently and effectively. In this regard, the Court emphasizes that, during the public hearing, Argentina expressed its absolute willingness to hold discussions in order to adopt all necessary measures to protect the rights to life and integrity of the beneficiaries, and the representatives also expressed the need to hold these discussions. Furthermore, following the hearing, the representatives of the beneficiaries, the Commission and Argentina had a meeting to this end. 17. That, regarding the specific measures of protection to guarantee effectively the rights to life and personal integrity of the beneficiaries of the provisional measures, the Court reiterates that all necessary measures to achieve this goal must be adopted and, to this end, the gravity of the situation and the specific circumstances of the danger must be taken into account; also, they must be implemented as indicated in the preceding paragraph. On this point, during the public hearing, the representatives expressed their opinion about the different measures they consider should be adopted (supra Having seen paragraph 17). In this regard, it is worth noting that, during this hearing, Argentina indicated that it “reiterated its complete willingness to implement all those additional measures reasonably necessary to safeguard the life and physical integrity of the beneficiaries” (supra Having seen paragraph 18(f)). Also, it indicated that “if some of the matters raised at the hearing had been raised in the appropriate sphere, they would have obtained a favorable response [from the State] at the time they occurred” (supra Having seen paragraph 18(f)). In particular, it is worth emphasizing what Argentina indicated with regard to the measures in favor of Miguel Ángel Sánchez and Juan Pablo Caba (supra Having seen paragraphs 17(c) and 18(d)), and with regard to the request for a subsidy (supra Having seen paragraphs 17(d) and 18(f)). 18. That the Court is concerned about what is happening to the granddaughters of María Leontina Millacura Llaipén, the daughters of Marcos and Valeria. As the Court was informed, at the request of the director of the establishment they have not attended school for the last week, because she “did not want to have problems with them in direct relation to the case” (supra Having seen paragraph 17(d) and 17(e)). In this regard, the Court wishes to indicate that the measures of protection for these beneficiaries must include those measures necessary to ensure that the girls can attend school freely. 19. That, regarding the official statement made by Miguel Ángel Sánchez, beneficiary of the measures (supra Having seen paragraph 7), which the State was requested to retransmit, since the copy sent to the Secretariat was illegible (supra Having seen paragraphs 7 and 14(b)), the Court considers that the State should take the pertinent steps to provide the Court with a complete copy of the official statement made by Mr. Sánchez, who is deprived of liberty. 20. That effective compliance with the obligation to inform the Court about the implementation of the urgent and provisional measures requires the formal submission of a document, within the established time, and with specific, true,