Guillen Manuel, Vargas Soriano Napoleon, Vargas Utrilla Eustaquio, Varias Hurtado Eleazar Antonio, Vasquez Euribe Isabel, Vasquez Giraldo Carlomagno, Vasquez Rivera Jose Leonidas, Vasquez Vasquez Wilber Gonzalo, Velarde Ortiz Hector Raul , Velarde Ruesta Conrado Francisco, Velasquez Quezada Pedro, Velita Palacios Antonio Gamaniel, Venegas Sussoni Fernando Jose Elias , Ventocilla Ureta Rafael, Vera Rosas Jesus Eduardo, Vera Toro Juana Elvira, Vera Valderrama Vignar Nerio, Verastegui Oscategui Robin, Vicente Dulanto Maura Isabel, Vidaurre Guillermo Juan, Vidondo Cortez Jose, Vigil Urdiales Rita Maria, Vigo Flores Carlos, Vigo Noriega Andres Jose, Vilca Nieto Jaime Napoleon, Vilcas Palomino German, Vilchez Chavez Jose Isidro, Vilchez Ordoñez Manuel Isauro, Villacorta Bellota Nemesio, Villacorta Lozada Cesar, Villafuerte Rivera Nelly Marcela, Villalobos Garcia Ascencion, Villalobos Ruiz Saturnino Vicente, Villalta Castañeda Jorge Octavio, Villanueva Soriano Jose Reynaldo, Villanueva Vidal Carmelo Edmundo, Villar Calagua Isaura Maria, Villaran Cavero Carmen Rosa, Villavicencio Valdivia Jaime Alejandro, Villena Ponce Narda Luz, Vivanco Terry Yolanda Cristina, Weissel Santillan Teodoro, Wong Chang Jose German, Yabar Acurio Marina Mauricia, Yalta Mezquita Herman, Yana Siguacollo Pablo, Yoplac Caman Jose Segundo, Yoza Yoza Agustin, Zaldivar Carhuapoma Jorge, Zamora Capelli Olga Alicia, Zamudio Espinoza Silvestre, Zamudio Rojas Nancy Aurora, Zapana Mamani Florencio, Zapata Diez Canseco Percy Walter, Zavala Vela Gladys Emilia, Zavaleta Remy Rosa Maria Del Pilar, Zavalla Contreras Julio Victor, Zegarra Matos Mario Antonio, Zevallos Huamani Claudio, Zumaeta Reategui Clara Melita, Zuñiga Montes Julio Evaristo, Zuñiga Stranguich Hilda, Zuñiga Vasquez Mariano Claudio. 18. The petitioners pointed out that since the SUNAT failed to comply with the provisions of the aforementioned law, on December 19, 1991, they filed an amparo petition requesting non-enforcement of the Third Transitional Provision of Decree Law No. 673, which contravened the provisions of Decree Law No. 20.530. 19. The petitioners added that this amparo petition was definitively resolved by the Supreme Court of Justice on October 25, 1993, when it ruled that the petition had merit and ordered the reinstatement of the petitioners right to receive a pension on a par with the level of compensation for active service employees of SUNAT, as well as payment of the increases they had never received. 20. The petitioners alleged that, as a delaying tactic, on November 9, 1993, the Ministry of Economy and Finance lodged a petition for cassation with the Court of Constitutional Guarantees which, 11