-13- Commission keep in direct touch with them, in such a way as to allow it to provide the Court all the information related to the compliance with the provisional measures, as long as the aforementioned beneficiaries do not appoint another representative or do not communicate directly with the Tribunal on a regular basis. In the event that the Commission would come to learn that the aforementioned beneficiaries would have appointed a new representative, it must let the Tribunal know. NOW, THEREFORE: THE AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, in exercise of the authority conferred upon it by Article 63(2) of the American Convention on Human Rights and Article 25 of its Rules of Procedure, DECIDES: 1. To call upon the State to maintain the measures it may have adopted, or to adopt, forthwith, the measures that may be necessary to protect the life and personal integrity of Mr. Luis Alberto Ramírez-Hinostroza, of his wife Susana Silvia Rivera-Prado, of is three daughters: Yolanda Susana Ramírez-Rivera, Karen Rose Ramírez-Rivera and Lucero Consuelo Ramírez-Rivera, ordered by means of its Order of September 21, 2005, for which it is to take into account the gravity of the situation and the particular circumstances of risk. 2. To call upon the State to maintain for three months, as from the date the instant Order be notified, the measures necessary to protect the life and physical integrity of Mr. Carlos Rivera-Paz, ordered by means of its Order of September 21, 2005. Upon the expiration of such term, the Tribunal will from time to time assess the need to keep the aforementioned measures in force, depending on the situation with which Mr. Carlos Rivera-Paz may have to cope, and will adopt a decision thereon. 3. Reaffirms to the State that it must have the beneficiaries of the instant measures, their representatives and the Commission participate in planning and implementing of the protection measures and that it must keep them informed on the progress in its compliance therewith, in the terms of Considering clauses Number 15, 16 and 17 of the instant Order. 4. Reaffirms to the State that it must investigate the events which have lead to the instant provisional measures with the purpose to identify those responsible and punish them as due. 5. To call upon the State to continue reporting to the American Court of Human Rights, every two months, on its compliance with the measures adopted, and to call upon the beneficiaries of the instant measures or upon their representatives for them to file their observations to the reports the State has to produce every two months, within a four-week time limit, as from the date they receive them, and upon the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights for it to file its observations to such reports by the State within a six-week time limit, as from the date it receives them.