-8- the Order of September 21, 2005 and to two requests effected by the President , by means of his notes dated January 16 and 26, 2006. The State pointed out that: a) As far as the September 15, 2005 attack is concerned, “the prosecuting investigation was commenced” and the “pertinent procedures” are in progress; b) Regarding the desistment of the protection measures effected by Mr. Ramírez-Hinostroza, it was decided to continue providing the aforementioned protection, in charge of the police service, to the domicile of the aforesaid party, until knowledge of his place of abode be acquired; c) on November 4, 2005, Mr. Ramírez-Hinostroza communicated his desistment to the security staff and did not allow them to accompany him, pointing out that "he was going to prosecute them for harassment.” On that same day, the aforesaid party indicated he would travel to the interior of the country and that “he should not be followed.” In spite of the fact that Mr. Ramírez-Hinostroza would not come back to his domicile, “police staff continued to be detailed there to provide security service in favor of his family. It came to be known by police authorities that the beneficiary would have traveled to the city of Huancayo, for which reason word was sent to the Departamento de Seguridad del Estado (State Security Department) of the VII-DIRTELPOL-HUANCAYO of the possible sojourn of the [aforementioned] party thereat[,…] for the purpose of providing him there with the security measures due him in a discreet manner — given the attitude assumed by the beneficiary and his waiver of the protection afforded him.” In the abovementioned report, it was suggested that “it be resolved to permanently discharge the current personal protection service in view of the express waiver thereof” by Mr. Ramírez-Hinostroza “and that [he] does not allow those responsible for it to perform the task with which they have been charged”; d) as of the date on which Mr. Luis Alberto Ramírez-Hinostroza subscribed the desistment document, eight policemen in all, duly armed, were being deployed for his benefit and that of his family, and the whole was split into two groups detailed to 24-hour shifts. A bullet-proof vest was given Mr. Luis Alberto Ramírez-Hinostroza, so that he could go out. Such personnel fended off the alleged attacks of June 1 and of September 15, 2005. It was furthermore decided to have it “taken into consideration when fixing the Hojas de Ruta de Patrullaje Motorizado y a Pie (Itineraries for the Patrols on Foot and in Motor Vehicles) to effect successive rounds, including the areas lying close to the domicile of the aforementioned protected party.” Regarding the provision of a vehicle, none is currently available; e) concerning the attempted suicide by Mr. Ramírez-Hinostroza, on November 20 2005 the wife of the aforesaid party requested support from a mobile unit and he was taken to the Hospital Jorge Botto Bernales (“Jorge Botto Bernales” Hospital) in the Santa Anita district, where he received care and was diagnosed “Organic Phosphorated Poisoning – Attempted Suicide.” Later on, the aforesaid party was taken to another hospital “where he was admitted for observation and where he remained, waiting for the vacancy of a bed to happen somewhere, so that he could be finally sent there.” Such

Seleccionar párrafo de destino3

Conectar a un párrafo
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Añadir a la tabla de contenidos