-114(MEASURES OF SATISFACTION AND NON-REPETITION GUARANTEES) Publication of the Judgment 313. As ordered in previous cases, and as a measure of satisfaction,179 the State must publish once in the official gazette and in another daily newspaper with broad national coverage, the chapter on proven facts of this Judgment, without its footnotes, together with the operative paragraphs therein. The publications will be made within six months as from the date notice of this Judgment be served. 314. With regard to the other claims, the Court considers that this Judgment constitutes, in and of itself, a form of reparation for the victims. E) COSTS AND EXPENSES 315. As the Court has stated on previous occasions, the costs and expenses are contemplated within the concept of reparations as enshrined in Article 63(1) of the American Convention, since the victims’ efforts to obtain justice at the domestic as well as at the international levels lead to expenses that must be compensated when the State’s international responsibility has been determined in a conviction judgment. With regard to their reimbursement, the Court must prudently assess their extent, which involve the expenses incurred when acting before the authorities with domestic jurisdiction as well as those incurred in the course of the proceedings before the Inter-American System, taking into account the particular circumstances of the specific case and the nature of international jurisdiction for the protection of human rights. Such estimate must be made on grounds of equitable principles and in consideration of the expenses represented by the parties, as long as their amount be reasonable.180 316. The Court takes into consideration that the victims and their representatives incurred costs relating to the domestic processing of the appeals for legal protection, as well as before the Inter-American Commission and this Court. Likewise, it has been noted that during most of the proceedings before this Court the common intervener was given support by the Centro de Asesoría Laboral del Perú (CEDAL) (Labor Counseling Center of Peru). As there is no documentary evidence of the costs incurred in the actions taken in representation of the victims in the international proceedings or of the costs incurred in the proceedings brought before the domestic courts, this Court determines, on equitable grounds, costs and expenses in the amount of US$ 16,000.00 (sixteen thousand United States Dollars) or an equivalent amount in Peruvian currency, to be distributed in equal shares between the Centro de Asesoría Laboral del Perú (CEDAL) (Labor Counseling Center of Peru) and the seven groups of victims´ representatives listed in the application filed with the Court. Each of the referred groups of representatives will appoint a person to collect the amounts on their behalf. The State must pay the referred amounts within the term of one year. 179 Cf. Case of Gómez-Palomino, supra note 21, para. 142; Case of García-Asto and Ramírez-Rojas, supra note 16, para. 282; and Case of Blanco-Romero, supra note 24, para. 101. 180 Cf. Case of Blanco-Romero, supra note 24, para. 114; Case of García-Asto and Ramírez-Rojas, supra note 16, para. 286; and Case of Gómez-Palomino, supra note 21, para. 150.