-16filed another brief informing about an “omission of the common intervener to submit appendixes to the final arguments.” 96. On December 22, 2005, the Secretariat, following the instructions of the President, granted an extension until to January 9, 2006 to the Commission and the common intervener so they could send the comments they might deem fit regarding the documents filed by the State on December 21, 2005. 97. On December 22, 2005, the Inter-American Commission filed its comments to the clarifications, explanations and documents that had been submitted by the other parties, in response to the request made by the Court after the final oral arguments at the public hearing and through notes dated October 14, 2005, as well as the comments to the documents attached to the final written arguments (supra paras. 72, 73 and 85.) 98. On December 28, 2005, the State filed two briefs together with their corresponding appendixes in order to make reference to “court files that have been closed due to discontinuance” and to “Evidence (court judgments) regarding the corruption network.” 99. On January 6, 2006, following instructions of the President, a term was granted, extending to January 12, 2006 for the Inter-American Commission and the common intervener to forward the comments that they might deem fit regarding the aforementioned briefs submitted by the State on December 28, 2005 and their appendixes (supra para. 98.) 100. On January 4, 2006, the common intervener filed a brief, along with its appendixes, in order to submit some appendixes, that were still pending, to the final written arguments and requested that “some omissions and errors be corrected” “regarding the identification of the alleged victims” (supra paras. 72 and 82.) 101. On January 4, 2006, the common intervener forwarded the pending appendixes to its comments to the clarifications, explanations and documents submitted by Peru (supra para. 88.) 102. On January 9 and 12, 2006, the Inter-American Commission filed its comments to the briefs filed by Peru on December 21 and 28, 2005 (supra paras. 94 and 98.) 103. On January 10 and 16, 2006, the common intervener for the representatives filed its comments to the brief submitted by Peru on December 21, 2005 and to one of the briefs submitted on December 28, 2005 (supra paras. 94 and 98.) 104. On January 17, 2006, the President requested the parties to produce evidence to facilitate the adjudication of the case. 105. On January 17, 2006, the common intervener filed its comments to one of the briefs filed by the State on December 28, 2005 (supra para. 98.) 106. On January 20, 2006, the common intervener forwarded the evidence to facilitate the adjudication of the case that had been requested by the President (supra para. 104.)