-22125. The Court has noted that during the proceeding before the Commission the State did not invoke the failure to exhaust the domestic remedies. On the contrary, it acknowledged its international responsibility for the violation of Article 25(2)(c) of the Inter-American Convention. The Commission examined the admissibility of the petition and issued the Report on Admissibility No. 85/01 on October 10, 2001, wherein it stated, inter alia, that “[th]e State [had] not filed any objection regarding the requirement to exhaust the remedies of the domestic jurisdiction.” 126. Therefore, as a consequence of having failed to file a procedurally timely objection for failure to exhaust the domestic remedies, the Court concludes that Peru has implicitly waived its right to invoke it, whereby it dismisses the preliminary objection filed by the State. 127. The Court has noted that the above order of amparo has been in the enforcement phase for seven years and a half. Since there might be an unwarranted delay in the enforcement of judgment, this matter is closely related to the merits of the case, whereby it will be examined together with the alleged violations of the Convention. * * * b) “the list of persons stated in the application does not include any former worker of Empresa de Servicios Municipales de Limpieza de Lima - ESMLL (Lima Municipal Cleaning Services Corporation)” 128. The Court dismisses this argument of the State as irrelevant in that it has no bearing on the alleged objection for “failure to exhaust the previous domestic remedies.” * * * SECOND PRELIMINARY OBJECTION “lack of legal standing of the complainants to act” 129. Arguments by the State a) it “supports” its objection on Articles 23(1) and 37 of the Court’s Rules of Procedure and on Agreements No. 87 and 98 of the International Labor Organization, which set forth trade union autonomy and bar the commission of acts of interference designed to violate it. The complainants are not workers of the Municipalidad Metropolitana de Lima (Metropolitan Municipality of Lima)), nor are they the current representatives of the Sindicato de Trabajadores Municipales de Lima - SITRAMUN-LIMA (Lima Municipal Workers’ Union), as they have claimed to be before the Court; b) there is no identity or link between those entitled to the rights under discussion and the complainants, a prerequisite for the existence of a valid procedural relation between the parties to a case;