-64- 204(46) On November 12, 1997, the Sala Corporativa Transitoria Especializada en Derecho Público (Corporate Provisional Chamber Specializing in Public Law) dismissed the complaint for lack of merit with respect to eleven plaintiffs and upheld the complaint in respect of three plaintiffs, and ordered in relation to the latter that “the Mayoral Resolutions directing their dismissals […] and any ensuing resolutions be set aside; therefore the defendant shall reinstate the plaintiffs to their jobs with the same rights, benefits and conditions of employment they enjoyed prior to dismissal, with back pay for lost wages and other benefits from the date of implementation of said resolutions to the date of reinstatement.”87 The Municipality of Lima and the workers in respect of whom the complaint was dismissed for lack of merit filed an extraordinary appeal for judicial review on constitutional grounds of some aspects of the decision. On November 11, 1998, the Tribunal Constitucional (Constitutional Court) affirmed part of “the decision of the Sala Corporativa Transitoria Especializada en Derecho Público (Corporate Provisional Chamber Specializing in Public Law) […] of November 12, 1997 […, and] reversed the part that dismissed the complaint for lack of merits,” and, in amending the decision, the Court held “the Mayoral Resolutions [ordering their dismissals…] inapplicable to the [11] plaintiffs and ordered the Municipalidad Metropolitana de Lima (Metropolitan Municipality of Lima) to reinstate the plaintiffs to their jobs or similar positions, without back pay for lost wages.”88 204(47) On August 26, 1998, November 30, 1998, February 4, 1999, June 18, 1999, August 13, 1999, September 15, 1999 and May 10, 2000, the Primer Juzgado Corporativo Transitorio Especializado en Derecho Público (First Provisional Corporate Court Specializing in Public Law) issued Orders, directing the Municipality of Lima to comply with the final judgments rendered by the Sala Corporativa Transitoria Especializada en Derecho Público (Corporate Provisional Chamber Specializing in Public Law) on July 14, 1998, March 31, 1999 and December 22, 1999 and those rendered by the Tribunal Constitucional (Constitutional Court) on April 3, 1998, May 13, 1998, October 16, 1998 and November 11, 199889 (supra para. 204(43). 204(48) The Municipality filed objections to the requirements to enforce the judgments rendered of July 14 and October 16, 1998 (supra para. 204(47), on the grounds of, inter alia, budgetary austerity regulations.90 87 Cf. Judgment rendered by the Sala Corporativa Transitoria Especializada en Derecho Público (Corporate Provisional Chamber Specializing in Public Law) on November 12, 1997 (file of appendixes to the application, appendix 30, folio 1664). 88 Cf. Judgment rendered by the Tribunal Constitucional (Constitutional Court) on November 11, 1998 (file of appendixes to the application, appendix 30, folio 1669). 89 Cf. Orders issued by the Primer Juzgado Corporativo Transitorio Especializado en Derecho Público (First Corporate Provisional Court Specializing in Public Law) on August 26, 1998, June 18, 1999, May 10, 2000, February 4, 1999, November 30, 1998, August 13, 1999 and September 15, 1999 (file of appendixes to the application, appendixes 25, 26, 27, 28, 31 and 32, folios 1487, 1495, 1527, 1549, 1688 and 1704; and file of preliminary comments, merits, reparations and costs, Volume XI, page 3822). 90 Cf. Judgment rendered by the Sala Corporativa Transitoria Especializada en Derecho Público (Corporate Provisional Chamber Specializing in Public Law) Law on June 11, 1999; and Order rendered by the Primer Juzgado Corporativo Transitorio Especializado en Derecho Público (First Corporate Provisional Court Specializing in Public Law) on May 10, 2000 (file of appendixes to the application, appendixes 26 and 28, folios 1496 and 1549).