-65- 204(49) On June 11, 1999, the Sala Corporativa Transitoria Especializada en Derecho Público (Corporate Provisional Chamber Specializing in Public Law) rendered a decision, declaring the objection to enforce the judgment rendered on July 14, 1998 without merit, on the grounds, inter alia, that: “the Municipality may not rely on the prohibitions laid down in the 1998 Budget Act to avoid compliance with a court decision with authority of final judgment […;] legal authorities generally agree that conduct determined in a final judgment prevails over conduct prescribed by law, for otherwise the final judgment would be invalidated […].”91 204(50) On May 10, 2000, the Primer Juzgado Corporativo Transitorio Especializado en Derecho Público (First Provisional Corporate Court Specializing in Public Law) rendered a decision, declaring the objection to enforce the judgment rendered on October 16, 1998 without merit, on the grounds, inter alia, that: “Article 1 of the Political Constitution stresses the importance of the individual over interests; especially if we take into account that this is not about the creation of a new job opening, but of the restoration of a right that existed before it was infringed […;] compliance with the court’s decision does not entail a violation of the regulations mentioned above, nor does it give rise to administrative responsibility on the officers that comply with it, insofar as the decision enforced or complied with emanates from a judicial body […].”92 204(51) In its decisions of June 16 and 22, 1999, the Sala Corporativa Transitoria Especializada en Derecho Público (Corporate Provisional Chamber Specializing in Public Law) declared two new objections to enforce the judgment dated July 14, 1998 filed by the Municipality of Lima without merit. The Court, in its decision of June 22, 1999, ordered “to request, for the last time, the Mayor of the Provincial Council […] to proceed to reinstate the workers to their jobs, with the same rights and benefits they enjoyed prior to dismissal, within a delay not exceeding three days.”93 D) WITH RESPECT TO THE APPLICATION OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS D(1)) Reduction in compensation 204(52) On January 17, 1996, the Municipalidad Metropolitana de Lima (Metropolitan Municipality of Lima) issued Mayoral Resolution No. 044-A-96, ordering, inter alia, to: 91 Cf. Order rendered by the Sala Corporativa Transitoria Especializada en Derecho Público (Corporate Provisional Chamber Specializing in Public Law) on June 11, 1999 (file of appendixes to the application, appendix 26, folio 1496). 92 Cf. Order rendered by the Primer Juzgado Corporativo Transitorio Especializado en Derecho Público (First Corporate Provisional Court Specializing in Public Law) on May 10, 2000 (file of appendixes to the application, appendix 28, folio 1549). 93 Cf. Orders rendered by the Sala Corporativa Transitoria Especializada en Derecho Público (Corporate Provisional Chamber Specializing in Public Law) on June 16 and 22, 1999 (file of appendixes to the application, appendix 26, folios 1498 and 1499).