-7h) the representatives accepted “the payment of the obligation of the international judgment” in bonds of public debt, that is, they agree with the change of monetary modality, requesting that the risks of the operation of redemption be assumed by the State. The rights contained in the securities correspond to the value of the Judgment, and once consigned in the Account of the Central Deposit of Securities of the Bank of the Republic, they are freely negotiable in the public stock market and, therefore, subject to the profits or losses implicit to the operations. The redemption risks of the bonds of the Treasury do not constitute a lien or tax over the payments they represent; i) it is carrying out the budgetary approaches that will allow payment of the costs and expenses ordered; and j) with regard to the next of kin of the 3 tradesmen regarding whom there is not enough information to identify them in order to pay the compensations set in the Judgment, in order to find out there whereabouts it made publications through the means and with the content ordered in the Judgment. In a footnote it indicated that it was enclosing the copies of the “certifications issued by the media in which the publications, written, through radio, and television, were made.” The State later forwarded said Appendixes. (infra Consideration 8). 6. The brief of July 28, 2005 and its Appendix, through which the representatives asked the Court to summon a meeting to continue with the conversations destined to agreeing on the mechanisms that must be adopted in order to fully comply with the measures of reparation. Likewise, they requested that several State entities be summoned to the mentioned meeting. 7. The brief of September 5, 2005, through which the State transcribed the content of the official letter DDH.46840 addressed to the representatives, in which they transmitted the “notes of style” signed by the Vice-President of the Republic addressed to the next of kin of the victims that did not assist to the public act of acknowledgment of responsibility. In the mentioned notes, the Vice-President expressed, inter alia: “We understand and regret what occurred and the damages caused for which we ask for your forgiveness on behalf of our Nation, which accepts responsibility for the facts […] we reaffirm our will to adopt the measures necessary to avoid these facts from happening again.” Said letter was forwarded to the Secretariat of the Court on September 16, 2005. 8. The brief of September 9, 2005, through which the State forwarded the remaining Appendixes to its report of July 26, 2005 (supra Consideration 5(j)). Among them, it presented the following documents in relation with the measures carried oit to find the next of kin of three victims and give them the reparations that correspond to them: copy of a certification issued by the Programming Manager of CM&Televisión regarding the transmission of the edict of the victim Juan Bautista; copy of a certification issued by the radio station Radio Continental Cadena Básica de Todelar regarding the location of the next of kin of the three victims; and copy of the publications on the location of the next of kin of the three victims in the newspaper El Tiempo on June 16, 18, and 20, 2005. 9. The notes of the Secretariat of the Court of September 13 and 27, 2005, through which it, inter alia, requests that the representatives and the Inter-American