-9effectively acknowledged the Court’s decision. The State should have included the commanders of the military forces and the police in the act; e) regarding medical and psychological treatment, it is first necessary to know the expectations of the next of kin of the victims, to determine in which measure these institutions are trained to respond to the specific assistance they are being obliged to, since it is a specific attention that implies the exposure of very personal and intimate information that would imply taking strict measures to ensure that the professionals in charge of helping them handle the information with the greatest discretion; f) regarding the establishment of the conditions for the return of the next of kin of Mr. Florez Contreras, the State has the duty to study the security situation, determine which are the measures and actions carried out by the authorities in order to establish the conditions and guarantees that the State should offer the next of kin of Antonio Florez Conteras so they may return to their place of residence. They request that the State inform of the actions carried out to confront, investigate, prosecute, and punish the paramilitary groups that provoked the forceful move of Antonio Florez Contreras’ family; g) regarding payment of the compensations to the next of kin of the victims, they consider that it is indispensable that Colombia pay the amounts in which the next of kin must incur in order to make the bonds effective in an anticipated manner at a 10-year expiration term, since the State is obliged to pay the total value of the compensation without discounts of any nature; h) regarding the publications in order to find out the whereabouts of the next of kin of the three victims, in order to pay them the compensations set in the Judgment, the next of kin of the victim Alberto Gómez “already appeared before the State.” The copies of the publications sent by the State indicate that it only made the oral and written publications but not the television ones. Besides, said publications were made too close to one another. The attestation of CM& television makes reference to the transmission of the communication through the radio station “Sonido Bestial” on June 15, 17, and 20, 2005; and i) the State has informed them that the payment of costs and expenses is being processed through an administrative body of State resources, FONADE. That body has asked them to present some forms in order to proceed with the payment. They consider that while the form and conditions in which the compensations will be paid, payment of the costs and expenses cannot be received. 11. The brief of October 19, 2005, through which the Commission presented its observations to the State’s report of July 26, 2005 and the State’s report of July 13, 2005 (supra Considerations 3, 5, and 9). It left evidence of its concern regarding the fact that the State had only adopted measures seeing to ensure compliance of a few obligations. Likewise, it indicated that it considers that the Court decided to “give a consensual nature” to some of the obligations established in the Judgment, such as the erection of a monument, the placement of the commemorative plaque, the acknowledgment of responsibility and the provision of medical and psychological treatment. Besides, it indicated in synthesis, the following: