5 1. To reaffirm its order of April 23, 2004, in which it accepted the withdrawal of the preliminary objections filed by the State and admitted the State’s acknowledgement of international responsibility. 2. To declare that the dispute concerning the facts that gave rise to the instant case had ceased. 3. To declare, in accordance with the terms of the State’s acknowledgement of international responsibility, that the State had violated the rights embodied in Articles 5(1) and 5(2) (Right to Humane Treatment); 8(1) (Right to a Fair Trial); 11 (Right to Privacy); 12(2) and 12(3) (Freedom of Conscience and Religion); 13(2)(a) and 13(5) (Freedom of Thought and Expression), 16(1) (Freedom of Association), 21(1) and 21(2) (Right to Property), 24 (Right to Equal Protection) and 25 (Right to Judicial Protection) of the American Convention on Human Rights; and that it had failed to comply with the obligation to respect the right embodied in Article 1(1) thereof, in the terms of paragraphs 47 and 48 of th[e] judgment. 4. To continue hearing the stage of reparations and costs of the instant case. 19. On May 23, 2004, the victims’ representatives submitted their final written arguments. 20. On May 24, 2004, the State, and the Inter-American Commission submitted final written arguments. 21. On October 15 and 19, 2004, on the instructions of the President and in accordance with Article 45(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the Secretariat requested the Commission and the State, and the representatives, respectively, to present, by November 1, 2004, at the latest, a certification issued by the competent authority on the minimum wage for an agricultural worker in force in Guatemala at the time of the facts and up until today; the list of prices of goods on the Rabinal market, and the table of the daily exchange rate of Guatemalan quetzals to United States dollars of the Banco de Guatemala from July 1982 to date. The Secretariat also asked the Commission and the representatives to submit the birth certificates and any other appropriate information on some of the survivors of the Plan de Sánchez Massacre and a list of the women rape victims who had survived the massacre. In addition, the Secretariat requested the representatives to submit the birth certificates or any other appropriate information on Juan Cajbón Corazón, Enrique Cajbón Corazón, Guadalupe Cajbón Jerónimo, Luis Cajbón Oxlaj, Prudencia Cajbón Jerónimo, Ezequiel Grave Oxlaj and Andrés Grave Valey, identified as “survivors of the massacre, who did not lose next of kin,” the birth certificate or any other appropriate information on Faustina Cojom,2 a beneficiary of the provisional measures ordered by the Court on July 30, 2004, and also a list of the family groups who were members of the community of Plan de Sánchez at the time of the facts and of the survivors of those groups, for whom payment of compensation for indirect damage has been requested. 22. On November 5, 2004, the State, the Commission and the representatives submitted the helpful documentary evidence requested, in accordance with the extension granted. V 2 According to identity card No. Ñ-15, Registration No. 30,181 provided by the representatives, the correct last name of Faustina is “Cojom” and not “Tojom” as initially indicated. Faustina is a victim in this case and a beneficiary of the provisional measures.