15 judicial authorities of the State, or, should it be the case, within the scope of the bodies of the Inter-American System in an adversarial case in which there are allegations of violations against human rights. As it has already expressed before, this Court recognizes the existence of the power, and even the obligation of the State to guarantee the security and to keep public order,6 reason for which it is not possible to prevent the State from looking into the claims brought before it through a provisional measures proceeding. NOW THEREFORE: THE INTER AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, Exercising the authority conferred upon it by Article 63(2) of the American Convention of Human Rights, and Articles 25 and 29 of its Rules of Procedure, DECIDES: 1. To again request the State to immediately maintain and adopt the necessary measures to protect the life and personal integrity of all the children and adolescents institutionalized at FEBEM´s Tatuapé Complex, as well as that of all the persons within it. For that matter, it shall adopt the necessary measures to prevent violence outbursts, as well as to guarantee the security of the inmates and maintain order and discipline in the above mentioned compound. 2. To again request the State to maintain the necessary measures to prevent the inmates from being submitted to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, among which lasting confinement and physical mistreatment are included. 3. To again request the State, without prejudice of the measures of immediate implementation ordered in the operative paragraphs above, to maintain and adopt those necessary to: a) substantially reduce overcrowding in Tatuapé Complex, b) seize the weapons in the possession of the youngsters, c) classify the inmates according to the international standards on the matter and taking the best interest of the child into account, and d) provide the necessary medical attention to the detained children in order to guarantee their right to personal integrity. In this sense, the State shall carry out a periodic supervision of the detention conditions and the physical and emotional state of the detained children, with the participation of the representatives of the beneficiaries of these provisional measures. 4. To again request the State to make all the pertinent approaches so that the protection measures are planned and implemented with the participation of the representatives of the beneficiaries of said measures and that, in general, they are informed regarding to the progress of their implementation. 6 Cf. Case of Neira-Alegría et al. Judgment of January 19, 1995. Series C, No. 20, para. 75.