25 process of consultation. In this sense, they established that evidence of the offence of torture was not found. 58.2.27 On January 26, 2000, Ms. Bessie Dodd-Burke submitted a note of disagreement against the decision to approve the motion of non application of penal action in connection with preliminary investigation SC/3839/95-03. 58.2.28 On February 02, 2000, the State submitted its brief of observations to the November 04, 1999, communication of the Commission. 58.2.29 On February 21, 2000, the Coordinator of the Prosecutor’s Assisting Agents of the Prosecutorial Agency determined that the term of 10 working days […] allowed for the complainant to file in writing any note of disagreement with respect to the authorisation of non application of penal action [in preliminary investigation SC/3839/9503], which was notified on January 19, 2000 expired on February 02, 2000, no note of disagreement having been received in writing within the term allowed.” 58.2.30 On March 15, 2000, Ms. Bessie Dodd-Burke extended her statement of disagreement with respect to non application of penal action. 58.2.31 On April 5, 2000, Ms. Bessie Dodd-Burke requested the Office of the Parties Officer at the Coordinating department of the Prosecutor’s Assisting Agents of the Prosecutorial Agency to inform her about the proceedings concerning her January 26, 2000, disagreement statement. 58.2.32 On May 03, 2000, the Coordinating department of the Prosecutor’s Assisting Agents of the Prosecutorial Agency informed the Office of the Deputy Prosecutor for Central Preliminary Investigations about the advisability of withdrawing the record of preliminary investigation SC/3839/95-05 from the Historical and the Concentration files of said institution “in order to sustain the statement of disagreement” submitted in due time by Ms. Bessie Dodd-Burke on January 26, 2000. 58.2.33 On May 10, 200 the Office of the Deputy Prosecutor for Central Preliminary Investigations of the Distrito Federal Office of the Attorney General decided to reopen preliminary investigation SC/3839/95-03, to which effect it extracted it from said institution’s Historical and Concentration File. 58.2.34 On June 06, 2000, the Office of the Deputy Prosecutor for Central Preliminary Investigations of the Distrito Federal Office of the Attorney General confirmed final authorisation for non application of penal action in preliminary investigation SC/3839/95-03, as follows: a) In her statement of disagreement, Ms. Bessie DoddBurke reported the “public servants denounced for the ‘brutal