20 his father: his mother: Abinotoe Banai (deceased) Ajong Aloeboetoe Deede-Manoe Aloeboetoe his father: Abinotoe Banai (deceased) his mother: Ajong Aloeboetoe Richenel Voola his mother: Dadda Aside Indie Hendrik Banai his father: Eketo Tiopo his mother: Goensikonde Banai Bernard Tiopo his mother: Angaloemoeje Tiopo. XII 79. The Court considers it appropriate for the next of kin of the victims to be reimbursed for expenses incurred in obtaining information about them after they were killed and in searching for their bodies and taking up matters with the Surinamese authorities. In the specific case of victims Daison and Deede-Manoe Aloeboetoe, the Commission claims equal sums to cover expenses relating to each of them. These victims were brothers. It would seem reasonable to conclude, therefore, that the next of kin took the same steps for both at one and the same time and incurred in a single outlay. The Court consequently finds it appropriate to approve a single reimbursement for the two victims. In its brief, the Commission indicates that in all cases the expenditures were made by the mother of each victim. For lack of proof to the contrary, the reimbursement shall be paid to these persons. 80. The Commission’s brief states that the victims were stripped of some of their assets and belongings at the time of their detention. However, it does not present a claim in this regard and the Court will therefore refrain from analyzing this issue. XIII 81. The Commission asks the Court to order Suriname to pay the Saramaka tribe compensation for moral damages and to make certain, non-pecuniary reparations. Suriname objects to this demand on procedural grounds and maintains that the Commission presented this claim during the stage fixed for the determination of compensation. It had not mentioned this issue in its memorial of April 1, 1991. The Court does not consider the Government’s argument to be well-founded, for in proceedings before an international court a party may modify its application, provided that the other party has the procedural opportunity to state its views on the subject (cf. Factory at Chorzów, merits, supra 43, p. 7; Neuvième rapport