has taken note of the communications referencing threats against Mr. Danilo Rueda and [...] has proposed a meeting with the beneficiary organization [...] for [...]May 2, 201[4], in order to find a joint solution to the situation and to agree upon matters relating to the implementation of the measures to individually protect said beneficiary.” Thus, the risk faced by members of the Inter-Church Justice and Peace Commission “will have been dealt with[...] in the request for precautionary measures[...]". b) according to information from the National Protection Unit, among the collective measures provided "per the request of [the Inter-Church Justice and Peace Commission], there are currently eight (8) [protection...]schemes.” “Specifically, regarding Mr. Danilo Rueda’s situation, the National Protection Unit said that it has met on several occasions and that one of these schemes can be used by Mr. Danilo Rueda when he travels to the city of Neiva.” Moreover, the National Unit has moved forward “in order to assess Mr. Rueda’s risk, in order to take action[...].” On the other hand, the State reported that the National Police “is implementing preventive security measures consisting of rounds and reviews by police at the headquarters of the Inter-Church Justice and Peace Commission, located in the city of Bogota.” It also noted that “the members of the Human Rights Office of the Metropolitan Police of Bogotá carry out activities to verify compliance with the security measures given and carried out by the stations.” Given the alleged threats against Mr. Danilo Rueda in the city of Neiva, the National Police said that “[a] telephone number was provided to the [CIJP] from the Human Rights Office in order to assess and come to an agreement with Mr. Danilo Rueda about preventive security measures [sic], but that as of [March 13, 2014] it has not been able to make contact with the beneficiary [...].” Regarding the alleged attack with pellets at Mr. Rueda’s home on April 24, 2014, the State reported that these facts were made known to the National Police "in order for it to move forward with the actions that so correspond to it”; c) the State had initiated investigations in the context of the precautionary measures in favor of the Inter-Church Justice and Peace Commission and implemented strategies for it. Moreover, the Attorney General's Office of the Nation took action to follow up on these measures. However, the State recalled that the assessment of the effectiveness of the investigations and the mentioned procedures requires a possible review of the merits of the case; d) the State had adopted measures “to guarantee that human rights defenders may carry out activities in Colombia,” and e) given the aforementioned, “it consider[ed] that the requirements needed for the Court to order the State of Colombia to adopt the provisional measures in this matter have not been met” and requested that the Commission’s request be dismissed. 8. The Order of the Acting president of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on this matter (hereinafter the Order of the Acting president”) of May 2, 2014, wherein it decided to: 1. Require the State to adopt, immediately and in an individualized manner, the measures that are necessary and effective to guarantee the life and personal integrity of Mr. Danilo Rueda and, in turn, render an assessment of his particular risk so that the 7