6 of palm trees, in deforestation and desertification, and in the extraction of the palm fruit, cause them to return in order to exercise their property rights.” 18. That the Commission stressed that the completion of the process of delimiting and demarcating the collective territories of the beneficiary communities is closely related to the persistence of the risk factors for the beneficiaries. 19. That, based on the information provided by the State, the representatives, and the Commission, the President considers that the Court requires further information on the measures adopted to guarantee the necessary security conditions for the beneficiaries of these measures who have been forced to displace to return to their homes or to the “humanitarian refuge zones.” * * * 20. That, regarding the establishment of a preventive monitoring system for the communication system assigned to the communities that are the beneficiaries of these provisional measures, the State reported that the Ministry of the Interior and of Justice had decided to coordinate with the communities the proposed Strategic Plan to implement the early warning system and to coordinate the delivery of the satellite equipment. 22. That the representatives indicated that there had been no coordination activities with regard to the Strategic Plan, even though the beneficiaries had requested this repeatedly. 23. That the Inter-American Commission considered that this obligation had not been complied with as effectively as possible, in light of the situation of the beneficiaries. 24. That the President considers that both the State and the representatives must submit precise information on progress in the implementation of the continuous monitoring and permanent communication mechanism in the so-called “humanitarian refuge zones,” in the terms of the sixth operative paragraph of the Order of March 6, 2003 (supra first having seen paragraph). * * * 25. That, on December 20, 2006, and October 1, 2007, 32 families from Pueblo Nuevo and Puerto Lleras, and 177 families from the Curbaradó Community Council, respectively, asked the Inter-American Court to accredit their own representatives in relation to the provisional measures granted to 515 families in this matter; to this end, the two groups designated two people to represent them. Both groups disown and reject representation by the Inter-congregational Justice and Peace Commission and ask to be granted the same guarantees that are being provided to other displaced persons to enter the “humanitarian zones” represented by that organization, as well as to be able to negotiate directly with the State in order to coordinate measures that benefit them. 26. That, in this regard, the representative accredited to the Court indicated that he did not represent these 32 and 177 families, who had not been presented as a specific target population for the measures requested by that organization, and that he only represented 161 of the 515 families that are beneficiaries of the provisional measures.