-615. The State shall, through the corresponding entity and within six months, provide the information requested by the victims, if appropriate, or adopt a justified decision in this regard, in the terms of paragraphs 157 to 159 and 168 of this judgment. 6. The State shall publish, within a period of six months, once in the official gazette and in another newspaper with extensive national circulation, the chapter on the Proven Facts of this judgment, paragraphs 69 to 71, 73, 74, 77, 88 to 103, 117 to 123, 132 to 137 and 139 to 143 of this judgment, which correspond to Chapters VII and VIII on the violations declared by the Court, without the corresponding footnotes, and the operative paragraphs hereof, in the terms of paragraphs 160 and 168 of this judgment. 7. The State shall adopt, within a reasonable time, the necessary measures to ensure the right of access to State-held information, pursuant to the general obligation to adopt provisions of domestic law established in Article 2 of the American Convention on Human Rights, in the terms of paragraphs 161 to 163 and 168 of this judgment. 8. The State shall, within a reasonable time, provide training to public entities, authorities and agents responsible for responding to requests for access to State-held information on the laws and regulations governing this right; this training should incorporate the parameters established in the Convention concerning restrictions to access to this information, in the terms of paragraphs 164, 165 and 168 of this judgment. 9. The State shall pay Marcel Claude Reyes, Arturo Longton Guerrero and Sebastián Cox Urrejola, within one year, for costs and expenses, the amount established in paragraph 167 of this judgment, in the terms of paragraphs 167 and 169 to 172. 10. It will monitor full compliance with this judgment and will consider the case closed when the State has fully executed its operative paragraphs. Within a year of notification of this judgment, the State shall send the Court a report on the measures adopted to comply with it, in the terms of paragraph 173 of this judgment. Judge Abreu Burelli and Judge Medina Quiroga informed the Court of their joint dissenting opinion concerning the second operative paragraph. Judge García Ramírez informed the Court of his separate concurring opinion on the second operative paragraph. These opinions accompany this judgment. Done in San José, Costa Rica, on September 19, 2006, in Spanish and English, the Spanish text being authentic. Sergio García Ramírez President Alirio Abreu Burelli Antônio A. Cançado Trindade

Seleccionar párrafo de destino3