2 4. The brief of May 28, 2008, by means of which a group of victims, namely, Mr. Wilfredo Chino Villegas, Ricardo Callirgos Tarazona, Ruben Reyes Caballero, Manuel Quiñónez Diaz, Luis González Panuera and Mrs. Jackeline Magallán Galoc, appointed Mrs. Carolina Loayza Tamayo as legal representative and stated that “they h [ad] not received information [from the common intervener or the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights]” and referred to the status of compliance with the Judgment. 5. The Secretariat’s note of June 4, 2008 by means of which it was informed that, as to the participation of the victims and the representatives during the stage of monitoring compliance with the judgment of this case, Article 23 of the Rules of Procedure, in force at the time, was applied in the same manner as in the stage of preliminary objections, merits and reparations of this procedure. Therefore, the different victims, relatives or duly accredited representatives, should have to address to the Tribunal by means of the common intervener of the victims’ representatives. In addition, as it has been informed since the beginning of the instant case, it was pointed out that the appointment of common interveners must not imply a limitation to the right of the victims to file with the Court its requests and arguments, inasmuch as the only purpose of such appointment is to ensure the most effective processing of the case before the Court, for the reception and official communication with the different representatives, taking into account the principle of procedural economy. Furthermore, it deemed appropriate to recall that the common interveners must convey, in their briefs, the several positions and arguments of the different representatives of the victims, though they must be forwarded to the Tribunal through a unique brief. Based on the foregoing, it was informed to the group of people that have appointed Mrs. Loayza Tamayo as their representatives that, from then on, they must address to the Tribunal by means of the common interveners of the victims’ representatives or, if applicable, by means of the Inter-American Commission. To such purpose, their brief was forwarded to the parties for only that time. 6. The brief of June 5, 2008 by means of which the common interveners stated that the information furnished by a group of victims (supra Having Seen clause 4) supplements what they have informed in the general meetings of the victims of the instant case. 7. The briefs of July 24, August 19 and October 25, 2008 by means of which the common interveners informed on the "serious difficulties" that arouse in relation to the compliance with the Judgment and criticized the lack of presentation of reports by the State; the briefs of December 11, 2008 and February 3, 2009, by means of which they forwarded additional information, as well as the brief of February 11, 2009, by which they forwarded the observations of a group of victims to the second state report (supra Having Seen clause 3) 8. The brief of April 22, 2009, by means of which the State forwarded information on “the compliance with operative paragraph 4 of the [J]udgment” and a copy of the order of the “Special Evaluation Commission”; the brief of May 7, 2009, by means of which the common interveners presented their observations to said state report and repeated their request for the Court to convene a hearing, as well as the respective observations of the Commission of May 9, 2009. 9. The brief of June 3, 2009 by means of which a group of victims referred to the compliance with the Judgment, as well as the Secretariat’s note of the following day, by means of which it recalled the previous communication regarding the participation of the victims and representatives during the stage of the monitoring compliance with the Judgment in this case. 10. The Order of the Court’s President of June 8, 2009, whereby it was decided to convene a private hearing at the seat of the Court for July 8, 2009, in order for the Tribunal to obtain information from the State regarding all the measures of reparation ordered in the