45. From the information provided by the petitioners, the Commission does not have sufficient evidence to rule on the possible characterization of a violation of the right enshrined in Article 24 of the American Convention. V. CONCLUSIONS 46. Based on the de facto and de jure considerations presented, and without prejudging the merits of the case, the Inter-American Commission concludes that the instant case meets the admissibility requirements established in Articles 46 and 47 of the American Convention and as a result THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, DECIDES: 1. To declare the petition under review admissible with respect to the rights enshrined in Articles 21, 8, and 25 of the American Convention as they relate to the obligations established in Articles 1(1) and 2 of the same instrument. 2. To declare the petition under review inadmissible with respect to the right enshrined in Article 24 of the American Convention. 3. To notify the State and the petitioner of this decision. 4. To begin processing on the merits of the case. 5. To publish this decision and include it in the Annual Report to be presented to the OAS General Assembly. Approved by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights on February 11, 2009. (Signed): Paolo G. Carozza, Chairman; Luz Patricia Mejía Guerrero, First ViceChairwoman; Felipe González, Second Vice-Chairman; Sir Clare K. Roberts, Florentín Meléndez, and Víctor Abramovich, members of the Commission.