5 in the attic of Record Files, not being able to determine if the file was sent to the Files of the Court or to the Court of Origin". 19. On September 28, 1998 the State submitted a brief related to the judicial situation of Mr. Nolberto Durand Ugarte and Mr. Gabriel Pablo Ugarte Rivera. 20. On October 26, 1998, the State, at the request of the Secretariat, submitted a brief related to a judicial situation of Mr. Nolberto Durand Ugarte. 21. On November 9, 1998, the Secretariat, following instructions by the President, asked the State, in keeping with Article 44 of the Rules of Procedure to submit some documentation regarding the filed habeas corpus recourse and charges of terrorism against Mr. Durand Ugarte and Ugarte Rivera as evidence for a better decision. 22. On November 27, 1998, the Inter-American Commission, by means of the Decision of the President, was asked, in view of said request in the application brief, to provide detailed information on evidence produced in Neira Alegría Case, asking for the inclusion of the evidence in this case. 23. On December 14, 1998, the Commission sent a brief wherein it indicated the documents of evidence produced in Neira Alegría Case, to be included in the evidence of this case. On January 11, 1999, the Secretariat sent said brief to the State and extended the deadline until the 22nd of the same month and year to submit observations it may deem relevant. To this date no brief has been submitted to this regard. 24. On January 6, 1999, the State requested a deadline extension to submit evidence for a better decision request, said extension was granted until January 22nd of the same year. On January 24, 1999, Peru submitted a pronouncement dated October 28, 1986 of the Court of Constitutional Guarantees concerning the action of habeas corpus, documentation regarding several procedures to find out about the actions related to the habeas corpus recourses and the case on terrorism, as well as documentation provided by the National and Corporate Penal Court for Cases of Terrorism, regarding Mr. Durand Ugarte and Mr. Ugarte Rivera. On March 3, 1999, the evidence was again requested to the State for a better solution which was previously asked for. To the date of this judgment, the State had not submitted the file processed for charges of terrorism against Mr. Durand Ugarte and Mr. Ugarte Rivera, or the documentation related to the habeas corpus recourse on their behalf in February 1986. 25. On April 7, 1999, the Court requested the OAS Secretary General for information related to the notification about the state of emergency or suspension of guarantees by Peru, decreed between June 1, 1986 and July 20, 1987. On May 19, 1999 Mr. Jean-Michel Arrighi, Director of the International Law Department of the OAS General Secretariat, informed that he had not received any notification to this regard. 26. On May 28, 1999, the Court issued a preliminary objections judgment. 27. On June 10, 1999 the Secretariat asked the Commission for a definite list of witnesses and experts who should be summoned at the public hearing. On June 29, 1999 the Commission informed that Mrs.Virginia Ugarte Rivera and the expert Robin

Seleccionar párrafo de destino3