93 313. Given the foregoing considerations, the Commission concludes that the State of Peru violated the rights to judicial guarantees and judicial protection, recognized in articles 8(1), 8(2)(b) and (c) and 25(1) of the American Convention, read in conjunction with the obligations undertaken in Article 1(1) thereof, to the detriment of Mr. Wong Ho Wing. V. CONCLUSIONS 314. Based on this analysis, the Commission concludes that the State of Peru is responsible for violation of the rights to personal liberty, life, humane treatment, a fair trial and judicial protection, recognized in articles 7, 4, 5, 8 and 25 of the American Convention, read in conjunction with the obligations undertaken in Article 1(1) thereof, to the detriment of Mr. Wong Ho Wing. VI. RECOMMENDATIONS 315. Based on this analysis and the conclusions reached in this report, the Inter-American Commission is recommending to the Peruvian State that it 1. Order the measures necessary to ensure that the extradition process is brought to a conclusion as soon as possible, in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Peruvian Code of Criminal Procedure, denying the extradition in strict compliance with the Constitutional Court’s May 24, 2011 ruling. In furtherance of this recommendation the State must ensure that none of its authorities put into practice mechanisms that would obstruct or delay enforcement of that ruling. 2. Order an ex officio review of Mr. Wong Ho Wing’s provisional arrest. In that review the State must take into consideration his legal situation upon the conclusion of the extradition process, effected in accordance with the terms of the recommendation made above. In particular, any court decision pertaining to the personal liberty of Mr. Wong Ho Wing must be made in strict compliance with the principles of exceptionality, necessity, and proportionality in the terms described in this report. 3. Make full reparations to Mr. Wong Ho Wing for the violations established in this merits report. 4. Within a reasonable period, order measures of non-repetition to ensure that in extradition processes, the procedures established in the Code of Criminal Procedure are followed to the letter and that the necessary safeguards are in place to ensure that any diplomatic or other assurances offered by the requesting State are procured and weighed in accordance with the standards set out in the present report on the merits.