30 67.v) Nora Emely Gómez Peralta has not been registered as the daughter of Rafael Samuel Gómez Paquiyauri, due to her mother’s fear.52 67.w) After the death of the minors, the next of kin of Rafael Samuel and Emilio Moisés Gómez Paquiyauri were harassed several times by the DINCOTE.53 Officers of the DINCOTE visited the Gómez Paquiyauri family’s house several times, breaking furniture and tearing mattresses in search of evidence to show that the youths were subversives.54 The DINCOTE also sent summons for the family to appear at their offices for interrogation;55 they constantly followed the members of the family56 and at night they parked police cars in the area.57 They offered the family money several times, apparently sent by the heads of the police and other authorities.58 67.x) Several members of the Gómez Paquiyauri family were affected by the facts. The parents of the alleged victims went to various places in search of justice, and received no response.59 The health of Mrs. Marcelina Paquiyauri, the mother of the alleged victims, deteriorated. In the days after the death of recognizing Nora Emely Gómez Peralta as the daughter of Rafael Samuel Gómez Paquiyauri (file with appendixes to the written brief containing pleadings, motions, and evidence, volume II, appendix 21, leaves 489 and 490); and statement rendered on March 30, 2002 by Jacinta Peralta Allccarima at El Callao (file with appendixes to the written brief containing pleadings, motions, and evidence, volume II, appendix 20, leaves 484 to 488). 52 Testimony of Jacinta Peralta Allccarima before the Court on May 6, 2004. See statement rendered on March 30, 2002 by Marcelina Paquiyauri Illanes de Gómez at El Callao (file with appendixes to the written brief containing pleadings, motions, and evidence, volume II, appendix 10, leaves 449 to 457); and statement rendered on March 30, 2002 by Ricardo Samuel Gómez Quispe at El Callao (file with appendixes to the written brief containing pleadings, motions, and evidence, volume II, appendix 18, leaves 475 to 478). 53 54 See statement rendered on March 30, 2002 by Lucy Rosa Gómez Paquiyauri at El Callao (file with appendixes to the written brief containing pleadings, motions, and evidence, volume II, appendix 1, leaves 404 to 411); statement rendered on March 30, 2002 by Miguel Ángel Gómez Paquiyauri at El Callao (file with appendixes to the written brief containing pleadings, motions, and evidence, volume II, appendix 8, leaves 439 to 443); and statement rendered on March 30, 2002 by Marcelina Paquiyauri Illanes de Gómez at El Callao (file with appendixes to the written brief containing pleadings, motions, and evidence, volume II, appendix 10, leaves 449 to 457). 55 See statement rendered on March 30, 2002 by Marcelina Paquiyauri Illanes de Gómez at El Callao (file with appendixes to the written brief containing pleadings, motions, and evidence, volume II, appendix 10, leaves 449 to 457); and “order to appear” issued on July 1, 1991 summoning Marcelina Paquiyauri to appear before the DINCOTE on July 3, 1991 (file with appendixes to the written brief containing pleadings, motions, and evidence, volume II, appendix 11, leaf 458). 56 See statement rendered on March 30, 2002 by Miguel Ángel Gómez Paquiyauri at El Callao (file with appendixes to the written brief containing pleadings, motions, and evidence, volume II, appendix 8, leaves 439 to 443). 57 See statement rendered on March 30, 2002 by Miguel Ángel Gómez Paquiyauri at El Callao (file with appendixes to the written brief containing pleadings, motions, and evidence, volume II, appendix 8, leaves 439 to 443). 58 See statement rendered on March 30, 2002 by Ricardo Samuel Gómez Quispe at El Callao (file with appendixes to the written brief containing pleadings, motions, and evidence, volume II, appendix 18, leaves 475 to 478). 59 See statement rendered on March 30, 2002 by Marcelina Paquiyauri Illanes de Gómez at El Callao (file with appendixes to the written brief containing pleadings, motions, and evidence, volume II, appendix 10, leaves 449 to 457).