5
to render an expert opinion at a public hearing.”
25. On April 7, 2005, the representatives of the alleged victim filed a brief
requesting “an authorization for [the] testimony of the [witnesses Manuel GonzálezAraya and Carlos Vega-Delgado, called by the President to appear at a public
hearing,] to be rendered through an affidavit.”
26. On April 11, 2005, the State sent two briefs stating that “it would not object to
the rendering of testimony by the expert […] Riego-Ramírez at the public hearing of
[…] May 9, [2005].” Moreover, the State communicated “its objection to the
request” made so that the witnesses González-Araya and Vega-Delgado could render
testimony through an affidavit.
27. On April 13, 2005, the Inter-American Commission filed a brief stating that “it
had no objections” regarding the request of the representatives that the opinion of
the expert witness Riego-Ramírez be rendered at a public hearing, and that the
witnesses Manuel González-Araya and Carlos Vega-Delgado, called by the President
of the Court to appear at a public hearing, render their testimony through affidavits
(supra paras. 24 and 25).
28. On April 20, 2005, the representatives filed a copy of the expert opinion
rendered before a “court officer of the Republic of Chile” by María Inés Horvitz (supra
para. 23). On April 29, 2005, the representatives filed exhibits to said expert
opinion.
29. On April 22, 2005, after the extension granted by the President, the
representatives filed a copy of the expert opinion rendered through an affidavit by
Carlos Peña-González and the testimony rendered through an affidavit by Raimundo
Jesús Palamara-Stewart (supra para. 23). The following day, the representatives
filed a brief stating their decision “to desist […] from obtaining the testimony of the
witnesses” Manuel González-Araya and Carlos Vega-Delgado (supra paras. 23 and
25).
30. On April 28, 2005, the President issued a Resolution ordering, among other
things, 1) to accept the waiver made by the representatives of the testimony of
Manuel González-Araya and Carlos Vega-Delgado, and to omit submission of that
evidence (supra para. 29); and 2) to call Cristian Riego-Ramírez, expert witness
proposed by the representatives, to render its opinion at a public hearing to be
held on May 9, 2005, as instructed by the President through a Resolution issued on
March 18, 2005 (supra paras. 23 and 24).
31. On April 29, 2005, the representatives filed a brief and an appendix, whereby
they informed that “on April 27, [2005], the expert witness […] Alex Avsolomovic[h
…] informed that he would not be able to travel to Asunción, Paraguay to render his
expert opinion in court[,] since he would undergo a surgery […]” and requested “to
be authorized to render an expert opinion through an affidavit.”
32. On April 29, 2005, Anne Ellen Stewart-Orlandini filed a brief and its appendixes
whereby it sent a copy of the affidavits signed by her and her children, Humberto
Antonio and Fernando Alejandro, both members of the Palamara-Stewart family, in
Seleccionar párrafo de destino3
Conectar a un párrafo
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Añadir a la tabla de contenidos