74 reparation to the children Dilcia and Violeta and to their next of kin for the harm suffered owing to the alleged violations of which they were victims. Arguments of the State 215. The State did not present any arguments in this respect. Considerations of the Court 216. The Court finds that the children Dilcia Yean and Violeta Bosico are the “injured parties,” as victims of the violations of the rights embodied in Articles 3, 18, 20 and 24 of the American Convention, in relation to Article 19 thereof, and also in relation to Article 1(1) of the Convention; they will therefore be beneficiaries of the reparations that the Court establishes for non-pecuniary damage. 217. In addition, Leonidas Oliven Yean and Tiramen Bosico Cofi, the victims’ mothers, and Teresa Tucent Mena, the child Violeta Bosico’s sister, as victims of the violation of the right embodied in Article 5 of the American Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) thereof, are considered “injured parties” in this case. B) PECUNIARY AND NON-PECUNIARY DAMAGE Arguments of the Commission 218. The Commission did not refer to pecuniary compensation for non-pecuniary damage, stated that: damage and, regarding (a) The reparations required to ensure that the State complies with its international responsibility include payment of fair compensation for “the nonpecuniary damage caused;” (b) The children’s uncertainty about their fate caused them and their next of kin anxiety and fear. The fear of two single mothers, with limited financial resources, that their children of eleven months and 12 years of age respectively, could be expelled and sent to Haiti, has a significance which goes beyond pecuniary reparation, and (c) In the case of Violeta Bosico, her mother experienced feelings of frustration on seeing that, owing to the imposing of a requirement with which she was unable to comply, and not because of lack of the right, but rather owing to discriminatory application of the law by several State officials, the efforts to ensure that her daughter could go to school and improve her situation were interrupted and suspended for a year. Arguments of the representatives 219. The representatives did not refer to pecuniary damage and, regarding nonpecuniary damage, indicated: (a) On its own, the judgment of the Court is insufficient to ensure that the violations committed in this case are not repeated or that full restitution is made to the alleged victims;