2 18. The State mus[t] provide free and immediate psychological and psychiatric treatment, through its specialized health institutions, as requested by the victims, in accordance with paragraphs 227, 231 and 238 of the [...] Judgment[;] 19. The State mus[t] grant Nelly Valle Jaramillo and Carlos Fernando Jaramillo Correa, within one year from the date of notification of the [...] Judgment, a scholarship to study or learn a trade, in accordance with paragraphs 227 and 231 of [the] Judgment[, and] 20. The State mus[t] guarantee safety if Carlos Fernando Jaramillo Correa considers returning to Colombia, in accordance with paragraphs 227 and 231 of [the] Judgment. 2. The Interpreting Judgment on merits, reparations and costs (hereinafter "the Interpreting Judgment") of July 7, 2009, whereby, inter alia it ruled the following: […] 2. Determine the meaning and scope of the provisions of operative paragraphs 13, 15, 18, 19 and 20 and paragraph 230 of the Judgment on merits, reparations and costs issued on November 27, 2008, in accordance with paragraphs 13, 23, 27, 28, 32, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 44 and 50 of the [... ] Judgment. […] 3. The Order of the President of the Court (hereinafter "the Order of the President") of April 29, 2010, whereby a joint private hearing on eight Colombian cases was convened in relation to monitoring compliance with the reparation measure on medical and psychological care so ordered therein. 4. The brief of May 5, 2009, whereby the representatives of victims (hereinafter "the representatives") reported that "on April 22, 2009 [...] paramilitary Francisco Enrique Villalba was assassinated," and the information in this regard provided by the Republic of Colombia (hereinafter "the State" or "Colombia") the May 22, 2009, and the comments made by the Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter "Commission" or "Commission") on June 3, 2009. 5. The brief of December 18, 2009, whereby the State reported on compliance with the Judgment (supra Have Seen 1). 6. The briefs of November 9, 2010, whereby the representatives of the victims presented their observations on the report submitted by the State (supra Having Seen 5). 7. The briefs of April 26, 2010, whereby the Commission presented its observations on the report submitted by the State (supra Having Seen 5). 8. The notes of the Secretariat of the Court (hereinafter "the Secretariat") of November 11, 2010, whereby the instructions of the President, requested the State of Colombia to submit, by no later than January 17, 2011, a new report on compliance with the Judgment (supra Having Seen 1). CONSIDERING: