17 Alejandro, Nelly María Rubina Arquiñigo, Odar Mender Sifuentes Nuñez, Benedicta Yanque Churo, and with regard to Natividad Condorcahuana Chicaña, Felipe León León, Tomás Livias Ortega and Alfonso Rodas Alvítez, as a result of the promulgation and application of Amnesty Laws No. 26479 and No. 26492. 3. To find, in accordance with the terms of the State’s recognition of international responsibility, that the State failed to comply with Articles 1(1) and 2 of the American Convention on Human Rights as a result of the promulgation and application of Amnesty Laws No. 26479 and No. 26492 and the violation of the articles of the Convention mentioned in operative paragraph 2 of this judgment. 4. To find that Amnesty Laws No. 26479 and No. 26492 are incompatible with the American Convention on Human Rights and, consequently, lack legal effect. 5. To find that the State of Peru should investigate the facts to determine the identity of those responsible for the human rights violations referred to in this judgment, and also publish the results of this investigation and punish those responsible. 6. To order that reparations shall be established by mutual agreement between the defendant State, the Inter-American Commission and the victims, their next of kin or their duly accredited legal representatives, within three months of the notification of this judgment. 7. To reserve the authority to review and approve the agreement mentioned in the previous operative paragraph and, should no agreement be reached, to continue the reparations procedure. Judge Cançado Trindade and Judge García Ramírez informed the Court of their Concurring Opinions, which accompany this judgment. Done at San Jose, Costa Rica, on March 14, 2001, in the Spanish and English languages, the Spanish text being authentic. Antônio A. Cançado Trindade President Máximo Pacheco-Gómez Hernán Salgado-Pesantes Alirio Abreu-Burelli Sergio García-Ramírez Carlos Vicente de Roux-Rengifo