12 18. That the State must comply with the aspects that remain to be fulfilled (supra sixteenth considering paragraph) forthwith. Accordingly, Peru must submit a report on the pending aspects indicated by the Court and, subsequently, the representatives of the victims and their next of kin, and also the Inter-American Commission, must present their comments on the State’s report. 19. That the Court will consider the general status of compliance with its judgments on merits (March 14, 2001) and on reparations (November 30, 2001) when it has received the said report of the State and the corresponding comments on the above-mentioned measures of reparation (supra sixteenth considering paragraph). THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, in exercise of its authority to monitor compliance with its decisions and in accordance with Articles 67 and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, Article 25(1) of its Statute, and Article 29(2) of its Rules of Procedure, DECLARES: 1. That, in accordance with the arrangements made by the parties in the reparations agreement, subsequently ratified by the Court in the judgment on reparations of November 30, 2001, the manner in which the State must make the payment of the compensation corresponding to the beneficiaries who are minors is by depositing the compensation amounts in a trust fund “under the most favorable conditions according to Peruvian banking practices.” 2. That the State must defray any expenses arising from the trust fund. The State may not deduct any percentage of the compensation corresponding to the minors for the administrative or financial expenses incurred by the trust company, to the detriment of the capital deposited in the trust fund. 3. As stated in the fifteenth considering paragraph of this Order, the State has complied in full with the aspects indicated in subparagraph (a) of the second operative paragraph and the sixth operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations delivered by the Court on November 30, 2001, as regards: a) Payment of compensation to the following surviving victims: Natividad Condorcahuana Chicaña, Felipe León León, Tomás Livias Ortega and Alfonso Rodas Alvítez (or Albitres, Albites or Alvitrez) (subparagraph (a) of the second operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of November 30, 2001); and b) Finding the next of kin of the victims Odar Mender Sifuentes Minez, Benedicta Yanque Churo and Tito Ricardo Ramírez Alberto, in order to grant them the reparations ordered with regard to the facts of this case (sixth operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of November 30, 2001). 4. That, as stated in the fifteenth considering paragraph of this Order, the State has complied partially with the contents of subparagraphs (b) and (c) of the second