84 b) with respect to the other items, it expressed its agreement with the criteria set forth by the representatives of the victim to establish compensation for pecuniary damage. Pleadings of the State 160. The State argued that “it is not under the obligation to redress the ‘alleged violation’ to the next of kin of the ‘alleged victim,’ as it is not responsible” for the facts alleged. 161. As regards the claims filed regarding lost income of Juan Humberto Sánchez, the State pointed out that it has not been proven that Juan Humberto Sánchez was an operator for “Radio Venceremos”, which was a “clandestine radio station of the guerrilla fighters of the Frente de Liberación Nacional (FMLN) of the Republic of El Salvador.” Considerations of the Court 162. This Court will now determine, in this section, the pecuniary damage, which involves the loss or detriment to the income of the victims, the expenses incurred due to the facts and the pecuniary consequences that are causally linked to the facts of the sub judice case,170 for which it will set a compensatory amount that will seek to compensate for the patrimonial consequences of the violations found in the instant Judgment. a) Lost income 163. The representatives of the victim and the Inter-American Commission requested compensation for lost earnings of Juan Humberto Sánchez based on the monthly salary he received as an operator at Radio Venceremos in El Salvador, which belonged to the Frente para la Liberación Nacional Farabundo Martí. In this regard, this Court recognizes that it is not possible to establish with certainty what the occupation and income of Juan Humberto Sánchez would have been at the time of his possible entry into the labor force in his country. Bearing in mind the lack of definitive evidence regarding the possible income that the victim might have obtained, the Court decides to set US$25,000.00 (twenty-five thousand United States dollars), in fairness, as the amount of compensation to be paid for the lost income of that period. 164. With respect to inheritance of the compensation for the deceased victim, the Court has established the following criteria:171 a) fifty percent (50%) of the compensation will be distributed, in equal parts, among the children of the victim. If one or several of the children have already died, their part will augment that of the other children of the same victim; in the case under discussion, this means that the two daughters, 170 Cf. Trujillo Oroza Case, Reparations, supra note 22, para. 65; Bámaca Velásquez Case, Reparations, supra note 153, para. 43; and Castillo Páez Case, Reparations, supra note 117, para. 76. 171 El Caracazo Case, Reparations, supra note 4, para. 91.