6 Miguel Angel Pavón Salazar, Alternate Deputy Ramón Custodio López, surgeon Virgilio Carías, economist Inés Consuelo Murillo, student Efraín Díaz Arrivillaga, Deputy Florencio Caballero, former member of the Armed Forces d) Witnesses presented by the Commission to testify as to "whether between the years 1981 and 1984 effective domestic remedies existed in Honduras to protect those persons who were kidnapped and who then disappeared in actions imputable to the Armed Forces of Honduras:" Ramón Custodio López, surgeon Virgilio Carías, economist Milton Jiménez Puerto, lawyer Inés Consuelo Murillo, student René Velásquez Díaz, lawyer César Augusto Murillo, lawyer José Gonzalo Flores Trejo, shoemaker e) Witnesses presented by the Commission to testify on specific facts related to this case: Enmidida Escoto de Godínez, wife of Saúl Godínez Alejandrina Cruz, mother of Saúl Godínez f) The following witnesses offered by the Commission did not appear at these hearings, notwithstanding the fact that they had been summoned by the Court: Leónidas Torres Arias, former member of the Armed Forces Linda Drucker, reporter José María Palacios, lawyer Mauricio Villeda Bermúdez, lawyer 31. After having heard the witnesses, the Court directed the submission of additional evidence to assist it in its deliberations. Its Order of October 7, 1987 reads as follows: A. Documentary Evidence 1. To request the Government of Honduras to provide the organizational chart showing the structure of Battalion 316 and its position within the Armed Forces of Honduras. B. Testimony 1. To call as a witness the nurse, sister of Enmidida Escoto de Godínez. 2. To call as witness, Marco Tulio Regalado and Alexander Hernández, members of the Armed Forces of Honduras. 32. By the same Order, the Court set December 15, 1987 as the deadline for the submission of documentary evidence and decided to hear the oral testimony at its January 1988 session. 33. In response to that Order, on December 14, 1987 the Government: a) with respect to the organizational structure of Battalion 316, requested that the Court receive the testimony of its