133 548. Although the Tribunal appreciates the medical and psychological care that the State has provided to some of the victims, the State did not prove that each of the next of kin had received or continues to receive some form of psychological, psychiatric or medical treatment, and did not validate the quality of the care or the consultations, and the progress made by the patients to date. 549. Consequently, as a measure of rehabilitation, the Court orders the State to provide appropriate and effective medical, psychological or psychiatric treatment, immediately and free of charge, through specialized state health institutions to all the next of kin considered victims by this Tribunal in the case sub judice, if they so wish. The State shall ensure that the professionals of the specialized health care institutions who are assigned to treat the victims assess the psychological and physical conditions of each victim, and have sufficient training and experience to treat both the problems of physical health suffered by the next of kin, and also the psychological trauma as a result of the gender-based violence, the absence of a State response, and the impunity. In addition, the treatment must be provided for all the time necessary and include the supply of any medication that may be required.528 6. Compensation 550. The State advised that, based on the acknowledgement of partial violation of the right to mental and moral integrity of the next of kin, it had granted, through its local and federal authorities, a series of measures of assistance to repair said violations.529 Hence, the State asked the Court to “analyze the data provided on the material support awarded to the next of kin of [the three victims] in order to determine that it had complied with the international obligation to compensate the victims owing to the acknowledgement of responsibility for the partial violation of said rights.” 551. The representatives indicated that “the only special support given to the victims’ families […] is the so-called ‘Financial Support Fund for the Families of Victims of Murders of Women,’ created in 2005 expressly to compensate the families of Ciudad Juárez victims of femicide,” and that “it is these amounts that the victims’ families have acknowledged as compensation or special payment for reparation of pecuniary damage, although they disagree with the requirements, procedures and conditions for its award because, before it was handed over, they were asked ‘to accept’ the remains of their daughters and to ‘desist’ from requesting DNA testing that would prove the family relationship.” 552. The representatives acknowledged that the State had granted the following resources from the Financial Support Fund for the Families of Victims of Murders of Women (hereinafter “the Support Fund”), to the persons listed below: Next of kin Esmeralda Herrera Monreal Irma Monreal Jaime Benigno Herrera Monreal Amount $136,656.00 pesos $34,164.00 pesos 528 Cf. Case of Kawas Fernández v. Honduras, supra note 190, para. 209, and Case of Anzualdo Castro v. Peru, supra note 30, para. 203. 529 The State quantified the value of the material assistance as follows: $551,874.27 (five hundred and fifty-one thousand eight hundred and seventy-four Mexican pesos with 27/100) for the next of kin of Laura Berenice Ramos Monárrez; $545,358.01 (five hundred and forty-five thousand three hundred and fifty-eight Mexican pesos with 01/100) for the family of Esmeralda Herrera Monreal, and $504,602.62 (five hundred and four thousand six hundred and two Mexican pesos with 62/100) for the next of kin of Claudia Ivette González.