offico, in order to gain a better appreciation of the evidence even when it has not been provided by the parties or the Commission.7 9. In this case, I share fully the decision adopted; however, I respectfully call on the Inter- American Court to remain alert and on the watch for proceedings that are submitted to its consideration and that, in principle, are legal in appearance but that, when a comprehensive analysis of the context and of the different probative elements is made, reveal a clear motivation and censorious components that violate the principle of equality and the guarantee of non-discrimination. L. Patricio Pazmiño Freire Judge Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary 3