- 123 - the Court considers it necessary that the authorities make a public apology because the victims suffered institutional violence by different state and federal bodies. During the act, reference must be made to the human rights violations declared in this judgment. Also, it must take place in a public ceremony in the presence of senior officials of the State and the state of Mexico, and the victims. 348. The State and the victims and/or their representatives must reach agreement on how the public act is implemented, as well as on the details, such as the date and place.456 Also, as it has in other cases,457 the Court orders the State to disseminate this act as widely as possible, including by radio, television and social networks. The Court also establishes that the apology should also be made in writing, signed by the corresponding local and federal authorities, to facilitate its distribution. D.2.c Scholarships 349. The representatives alleged that Angélica Patricia Torres Linares, Claudia Hernández Martínez and Suhelen Gabriela Cuevas Jaramillo were unable to continue their academic studies due to the consequences of the facts of this case. 458 Therefore, they asked the Court to require the State to guarantee scholarships to these three victims that covered the cost of completing their studies at the graduate or postgraduate level, in the establishments of their choice to which they are accepted, including the cost of enrollment, tuition, study materials, and other expenses related to their studies. Furthermore, regarding those family members whose academic plans were thwarted as a result of the facts of this case, they asked that Mexico be required to provide university scholarships for those sons and daughters who want them. 350. The State indicated that it had “proposed motu proprio to grant scholarships” and that it “has the structures and procedures required to provide this measure at the domestic level; thus the victims should exhaust these internal mechanisms.” It also indicated that such measures had been available to the victims since 2013. 351. The Court has established in this judgment that the facts of the case severely affected Angélica Patricia Torres Linares, Claudia Hernández Martínez, Suhelen Gabriela Cuevas Jaramillo and their next of kin, and these effects have continued over time and resulted in significant changes in their life projects, with an impact on their personal and professional development. In particular, the Court underlines that the events occurred when these three victims were pursuing university studies, which were interrupted owing to the severe psychological effects they suffered Judgment of August 27, 2014. Series C No. 281, para. 307, and Case of Velásquez Paiz et al. v. Guatemala. Preliminary objections, merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of November 19, 2015. Series C No. 307, para. 240. Cf. Case of Radilla Pacheco v. Mexico. Preliminary objections, merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of November 23, 2009. Series C No. 209, para. 353, and Case of López Soto et al. v. Venezuela. Merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of September 26, 2018. Series C No. 362, para. 303. 456 Cf. Case of the Miguel Castro Castro Prison v. Peru. Merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of November 25, 2006. Series C No. 160, para. 445; Case of the Yean and Bosico Girls v. Dominican Republic. Preliminary objections, merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of September 8, 2005. Series C No. 130, para. 235; Case of the Yakye Axa Indigenous Community v. Paraguay. Merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of June 17, 2005. Series C No. 125, para. 226, and Case of Coc Max et al. (Xamán Massacre) v. Guatemala. Merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of August 22, 2018. Series C No. 356, para. 163. 457 Angélica Patricia Torres Linares abandoned her political science studies at the UNAM because she associated the violations with her studies. Claudia Hernández Martínez was completing her bachelor's degree in political science and, owing to the events, felt unable to return to the university. However, she is currently studying for a master’s degree and for a doctorate. Suhelen Gabriela Cuevas Jaramillo’s academic plans were cut short owing to the time spent in prison and the psychological and financial impact of the facts. 458