4 management, and employees of Globovisión, and of the other persons who are in the facilities of said broadcaster or who are directly linked to the journalistic operation of this broadcaster. 2. To order the State to adopt, forthwith, such measures as [might] be necessary to protect the perimeter of the head offices of the Globovisión social communications broadcaster. 3. To order the State to investigate the facts that g[a]ve rise to adoption of the [...] measures, with the aim of identifying those responsible and punishing them as appropriate. 4. To order the State to allow the representatives of the beneficiaries of these measures to participate in their planning and implementation and, in general, to inform them of progress regarding the measures ordered by the President of the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights. 5. To order the State to report to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights within ten days of notification of the [...] Order, regarding the steps it ha[d] taken to comply with it. 6. To ask the representatives of the beneficiaries of these measures to submit before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, within five days after notification of the report by the State, such observations as they deem[ed] pertinent. 7. To ask the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to submit to the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights, within seven days after notification of the State’s report, such observations as it deem[ed] pertinent. 8. To order the State to inform the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, every two months, regarding compliance with the measures adopted, and to ask the representatives of the beneficiaries of these measures to submit their observations on the bi-monthly reports by the State, within one month after they receive them, and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to submit its observations on said reports by the State within six weeks, of when they receive them. […] 6. The August 30, 2004 brief by the State, in which if forwarded “the literal transcript of the reply by the Public Prosecutor’s Office of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela in the case of the Provisional Measure adopted in the Matter of ‘Globovisión’ Television Station.” In said reply, by the Public Prosecutor’s Office, the State expressed that: a) on March 5, 2004 the Fourth Court with oversight functions in the criminal court circuit of the State de Carabobo “adopted Measures of Protection” in favor of [Janeth Carrasquilla], instructing the Police of the State of Carabobo to carry them out.” The protection ordered by said Court is in force, but Mrs. Carrasquilla “has not appeared before the Public Prosecutor’s Office to express that it is not being carried out;” b) regarding “the other events mentioned in the document issued by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, with respect to which it is necessary to specify that these events took place in the Metropolitan Area of Caracas, in response to a request by the Public Prosecutor’s Office, the Thirteenth and Thirty-third Courts with oversight functions in the Criminal Court Circuit of the Metropolitan Area of Caracas on February 26 and March 15, 2002, respectively ordered Measures of Protection to safeguard the lives and safety of the workers, journalists, and technicians of the Globovisión […] television channel, instructing various security bodies of the State to carry them out,