71 regard. Consequently, on this point, the Court refers to the contents of paragraphs 116 to 118 of this judgment. Publication of the pertinent part of the Court’s judgment 173. As it has on other occasions,130 the Court considers that, as a measure of satisfaction, the State must publish within one year from the notification of this judgment, at least once in the official gazette and in another daily newspaper with national circulation in Peru, the section entitled “Proven Facts,” without the corresponding footnotes, and operative paragraphs 1 to 3 of this judgment (infra paras. 188(1), 188(2) and 188(3)). X COSTS AND EXPENSES Arguments of the Commission 174. The Commission requested the Court that, after hearing the victim’s representatives, it order the State to pay the costs incurred at the national level and at the international level by processing the case before the Commission, and those incurred as a result of processing the application before the Court. Arguments of the victim’s representatives 175. The victim’s representatives requested the Court to order the State to pay US$10,000.00 (ten thousand United States dollars) to the Medical Association of the Peruvian Social Security Institute, the Physician’s Professional Association of Peru and the Peruvian Medical Federation for the expenditure they incurred for the victim’s defense; also, a reasonable amount for professional fees for the representatives’ professional advice before the Commission, and the costs arising from processing the application before the Court. Arguments of the State 176. The State did not refer to the claims relating to costs and expenses formulated by the Inter-American Commission and the victims’ representatives. Considerations of the Court 177. As the Court has indicated on previous occasions,131 costs and expenses are included in the concept of reparation embodied in Article 63(1) of the American Convention, because the measures taken by the victim to obtain justice, at the domestic and the international level imply expenditure that must be compensated when the State’s international responsibility has been declared in a judgment against it. Regarding reimbursement, the Court must prudently assess their scope, and they include the expenses incurred before the authorities of the domestic jurisdiction, and also those incurred during the proceedings before the inter-American system, taking 130 Cf. Case of Tibi, supra note 1, para. 260; Case of the “Juvenile Reeducation Institute”, supra note 1, para. 315; and Case of Ricardo Canese, supra note 1, para. 209. 131 Cf. Case of Tibi, supra note 1, para. 268; Case of the “Juvenile Reeducation Institute”, supra note 1, para. 328; and Case of Ricardo Canese, supra note 1, para. 212.