5 State shall deposit the amounts in favor of the beneficiaries in an account or a deposit certificate in a solvent Paraguayan banking institution, in the terms of paragraph 335 of the […] judgment. 25. It will monitor compliance with all the terms of this judgment and will consider the instant case concluded when the State has complied fully with all its terms. Within one year of notification of this judgment, the State shall report to the Court on the measures adopted to comply with it, in the terms of paragraph 339 thereof. 2. The brief of March 8, 2005, in which the Tekojojá Foundation and the Center for Justice and International Law (CEJIL), representatives of the victims and their next of kin (hereinafter “the representatives”), requested that “in the publication that the State must make […] to comply with the [tenth] operative paragraph of the judgment […], the names of the children and their next of kin, which are mentioned in both the chapter on proven facts and in the operative paragraphs of the judgment, be omitted and, instead, only their initials be included […] in order to protect the safety and integrity of the young people and their families.” 3. The note of the Secretariat of March 15, 2005, informing the representatives that their request of March 8, 2005 (supra Having seen paragraph 2), had been granted. 4. The brief of April 27, 2005, in which the State del Paraguay (hereinafter “the State” or “Paraguay”) advised that, on April 23, 2005, “the proven facts and the operative paragraphs of the [judgment had been published] in the newspaper, “La Nación,” with national circulation, bearing in mind the request of the representatives of the victims” (supra Having seen paragraph. 2). 5. The brief of October 5, 2005, in which Paraguay submitted a report on compliance with the judgment, in the following terms: a) Regarding the publication of the pertinent parts of the judgment: on April 23, 2005, the State had published the operative paragraphs of the judgment in the newspaper, “La Nación,” and on May 18, 2005, the publication had been made in the official gazette; b) Regarding the organization of a public act to acknowledge international responsibility and announce a State policy for children in conflict with the law: the State had requested that representatives of different governmental institutions be appointed in order to establish a “technical task force” to elaborate short, medium and long-term policies concerning children in conflict with the law. The representatives of the victims would participate in this group. Once the said task force had been established, its work would begin. In this regard, the public acknowledgement would be made as soon as the results could be implemented in the community; c) Regarding the State’s obligation to provide psychological treatment to all those who were interns of the Institute between August 14, 1996, and July 25, 2001, as well as medical and/or psychological treatment to the former interns who were injured in the fires, and psychological treatment to the next of kin of the interns who had died or been injured, the Ministry of Public Health and Social Welfare had issued Resolution No. 654 establishing the regulations for the medical and psychological treatment of the interns and former interns affected by the successive fires that had occurred in the “Panchito López” Children’s Rehabilitation Institute, as well as their next of