101 D) 261. COSTS AND EXPENSES Arguments of the Commission The Commission requested the Court to order the State “to pay the costs arising at the domestic level from processing the legal actions filed by the victims or their representatives before the domestic system of justice, as well as those arising at the international level from processing the case before the Commission, and those deriving from processing the [...] application before the Court,” and it corresponded “to the Court to prudently assess [their] scope.” 262. Arguments of the representatives of the victims They requested the Court to order the State to reimburse: a) “To each candidate excluded from the municipal elections, all the expenses incurred during the consultation process with their community”; b) US$61,222.04 (sixty-one thousands two hundred and twenty-two United States dollars and four cents) in favor of YATAMA,189 for the expenses it incurred at the domestic and international level, from filing “the administrative recourses before [the Supreme Electoral Council] and judicial recourses before the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Justice,” and also as a result of the different meetings that it has had to carry out in the RAAN and the RAAS, in order to “assemble all its candidates and plan the best strategies for litigating the case at the domestic and the international level [and] to explain the corresponding progress to them.” YATAMA also incurred expenses related to “the preparation of the affidavits and the powers of attorney presented [to the] Court,” as well as to “the transportation and accommodation of some of those presented as witnesses during the hearing” before the Court; c) US$13,137.99 (thirteen thousand one hundred and thirty-seven United States dollars and ninety-nine cents) in favor of CENIDH190 for the expenses incurred in the international proceedings; and d) US$34,178.91 (thirty-four thousand one hundred and seventy-eight United States dollars and ninety-one cents) in favor of CEJIL191 for the expenses incurred in the international proceedings. 189 The description of the costs and expenses which YATAMA incurred and the receipts and documents presented to support these expenses are in: file of preliminary objections, merits and reparations, tome I, folio 200; file of appendixes to the brief with requests and arguments, appendix 16, folios 1108 to 1153; and appendixes to the final written arguments of the representatives, appendix 4, file of preliminary objections, merits and reparations, tome V, folios 1647 a 1650. 190 The description of the costs and expenses which CENIDH incurred and the receipts and documents presented to support these expenses are in: file of preliminary objections, merits and reparations, tome I, folio 201; file of appendixes to the brief with requests and arguments, appendix 17, folios 1154 to 1167; and appendixes to the final written arguments of the representatives, appendix 5, file of preliminary objections, merits and reparations, tome V, folios 1651 to 1669. 191 The description of the costs and expenses which CEJIL incurred and the receipts and documents presented to support these expenses are in: file of preliminary objections, merits and reparations, tome I, folio 201 and 202; file of appendixes to the brief with requests and arguments, appendix 14, folios 998 to