Chihuahua, México.246 In view of the situation described, the neighbors called the police but no one came. They also notified Sandra Luz Rueda Quezada, Jaime Alvarado’s wife, of what had happened.247 193. Sandra Rueda, Jaime Alvarado’s wife, went to the house and noticed that part of the entrance gate was off its hinges and that the house had been broken into. The house was a mess since there was clothing thrown on the floor, talcum powder emptied out onto the clothing, a torn unused condom in the living room, broken electrical outlets and light switches, furniture that had been moved out of place, and electrical cords that had been pulled out, and a message that said: “because we wanted to kill you and couldn’t we have you running scared and we’ll do you in along with your miserable family. Sincerely, You know who.”248 194. As a result of these events, on the afternoon of August 28, 2011, Sandra Rueda had a nervous breakdown which made her faint, and she had to be taken to a private clinic for medical treatment.249 Given the acts described above, the CNDH asked the General Prosecution Service of the State of Chihuahua to adopt precautionary measures to ensure the safety of Jaime Alvarado Herrera and his relatives.250 However, the Director General for Human Rights of the Secretariat of Public Security said that it was not possible to meet the request because it “prejudges the existence of acts of harassment by personnel of the Secretariat of Public Security without providing any evidence or indications of such actions.”251 195. In the framework of the FEVIMTRA proceeding, one of the attorneys for the victims said that they had once been threatened by being told that there were basements under the FEVIMTRA offices.252 196. The State reported in a communication dated September 20, 2011, that the Chihuahua Delegation of the PGR had opened preliminary inquiry No. AP/PRG/CHIU/JUA/2758/2011 because of the threats described in paragraphs 188 and 189; likewise it reported that the preliminary inquiry was being constituted.253 197. The Commission has sparse information about the opening of investigations and about their content with regard to the threats and incidents of harassment. 198. In this connection, on January 18, 2014, the State reported that the threats against Jaime Alvarado, on March 5, 2013, were the reason why investigation 2216/3760/2013 was opened in the Specialized Unit for the Investigation of Crimes against Physical Integrity and Damages of the Chihuahua FGE, an investigation that was previously being handled by the PGR.254 According to the State, that file included an investigation plan that attached special relevance to the context in which the events took place.255 However, the State noted that the investigation file in question did not contain “any information that made it possible to 246 Annex XX. Petitioners’ brief submitted as part of the MP 10-10 proceedings before the I/A Court H.R., August 29, 2011. 247 Annex XX. Petitioners’ brief submitted as part of the MP 10-10 proceedings before the I/A Court H.R., August 29, 2011. 248 Annex XX. Petitioners’ brief submitted as part of the MP 10-10 proceedings before the I/A Court H.R., August 29, 2011. 249 Annex XX. Petitioners’ brief submitted as part of the MP 10-10 proceedings before the I/A Court H.R., August 29, 2011. Annex I. Case file. Volume I. Request to the General Prosecution Service of the State of Chihuahua for precautionary measures, September 5, 2011, page 162 of the pdf. (Annex to the petitioners’ observations on the merits received on November 3, 2014). 250 251 Annex I. Case file. Volume I. Reply from the Secretary for Public Security to Official Letter V2/56239, September 3, 2011, page 157 of the pdf. (Annex to the petitioners’ observations on the merits received on November 3, 2014). 252 Annex I. Case file. Volume XVIII. Official Letter from FEVIMTRA to the PGR, January 10, 2011, page 448 of the pdf. (Annex to the petitioners’ observations on the merits received on November 3, 2014). 253 Annex XX. State’s brief submitted as part of the MP 10-10 proceedings before the I/A Court H.R., October 7, 2011. Annex. Official Letter No. SJAI/CAIA/DGCI/4190/2011. 254 Annex XX. State’s brief submitted as part of the MP 10-10 proceedings before the I/A Court H.R., January 18, 2014, para. 10. 255 Annex XX. State’s brief submitted as part of the MP 10-10 proceedings before the I/A Court H.R., January 15, 2015, para. 9.