107 y) “the vaginal revisions or inspections of the prisoners in the context of rounds of inspection […] carried out by male hooded police officers, using force, and without any other purpose than intimidating and abusing them constitutes flagrant breaches to the inmates’ rights, constituting violence against women.” Likewise, the vaginal revision practiced on the survivors’ female visitors “in complete absence of regulations, practiced by police, and not health, personnel, and as a measure of first and not last resource in the objective of maintaining the prison’s security constituted violence against women;” and z) other forms of sexual violence included threats of sexual acts, “touching”, sexual insults, forced nudity, beatings on their breasts, between their legs, and buttocks, beatings to the wombs of pregnant women, and other humiliating and damaging acts that were a form of sexual aggression. Arguments of the State 261. In synthesis, the State argued the following: a) in its response to the petition and observations to the brief of pleadings and motions, it stated that “it accepts the failure to comply with the general obligation of respect and guarantee of human rights established in Article 1(1) of the American Convention[, …] it accepts partial responsibility in the violations to the right […] to humane treatment, as long as the Judicial Power of Peru does not issue a ruling on the historical and detailed truth of the events that occurred between May 6 and 9, 1992;” b) in its final oral arguments it stated that “the facts […] cannot be hidden, the pain cannot be hidden, […] those injured cannot be hidden, the pan of the victims’ next of kin cannot be hidden;” c) in its final written arguments it stated that “even though individual responsibilities will be determined within the Domestic Jurisdiction, in the terms of the proceedings that are currently being followed before the Judicial Power […,] the magnitude of the facts to which the present proceedings refer and the responsibility of the Peruvian State in the same cannot be ignored;” and d) that “it acknowledges its responsibility for the facts that occurred between May 6 and 9, 1992.” Considerations of the Court 262. Article 1(1) of the American Convention states that: The States Parties to this Convention undertake to respect the rights and freedoms recognized herein and to ensure to all persons subject to their jurisdiction the free and full exercise of those rights and freedoms, without any discrimination for reasons of race, color, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, economic status, birth, or any other social condition.