4 certificate or account at a solid Peruvian banking institution, under the terms set forth in paragraph 247 of the […] Judgment. 22. The Court will oversee execution of this Judgment and will close this case once the State has fully complied with its provisions. Within one year from the date when notice is served of this Judgment, the State must submit a report to the Court on steps taken to comply with it, pursuant to paragraph 252 of the […] Judgment. 2. The Order of the Court of November 17, 2005, on compliance with Judgment, in which the Court decided: 1. To order the Sate to present a report on the stage of compliance with Judgment on the merits, reparations and costs, passed on July 8, 2004, not later than January 16, 2006; 2. To require the victims, their next of kin or their representative, as well as the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to submit their observations to the State’s report referred to in the preceding operative paragraph within a term of four and six weeks, respectively, next following receipt of said report; and 3. To continue monitoring compliance with Judgment on the merits, reparations and costs, passed on July 8, 2004. […] 3. The submissions presented by the Illustrated State of Peru (hereinafter, the “State” or “Peru”) on February 2, 2006; February 9, 2006; and June 20, 2006; in which the State reported as follows: a) Regarding the obligation to effectively investigate the facts of this present case, the State “has successfully followed up on the notification of the Court’s Judgment, by means of the Ministry of Foreign Office, an agency that in due course will notify the Supreme Court of the Republic, so that it would then be sent to the Superior Court of Justice of Callao and eventually to the relevant Court,” and stated that “it will prosecute this case, in conjunction with the aggrieved parties’ direct interest, as they are now in unrivalled conditions to seek enforcement of effective procedural protection;” b) regarding the obligation to perform a public act as acknowledgment of its responsibility, on July 15, 2005, the State held a ceremony as acknowledgment of its responsibility and in amends for the referenced incidents, with the presence of the Vice-Ministry of Justice —today’s Ministry of Justice— as well as the representatives of civil society, clergymen, means of communication and victims’ next of kin. In such ceremony, Ms. Jacinta Peralta Allccarima held the floor and addressed the audience; c) regarding the obligation to publish the relevant parts of the [referenced] Judgment in the Official Newspaper and another national coverage daily, the State so published it on December 22, 2005, in “El Peruano”, an official newspaper; and on December 30, 2005, in “El Comercio”, a domestic newspaper; d) regarding the obligation to officially name an educational center of the province of El Callao after “Rafael Samuel Gómez Paquiyauri y Emilio Moisés Gómez Paquiyauri,” at a public ceremony and in the presence of the victims’ next of kin, this issue must be dealt with in conjunction with the Ministry of Education and the civil society, within an appropriate social context;