11 5, 7, 8, and 25 in relation to Articles 1(1) and 2 of the American Convention, Articles I, III, IV, V, and XI of the Inter-American Convention on Forced Disappearance of Persons, and Articles 1, 6, and 8 of the inter-American Convention to Prevent and Punish Torture. 51. Finally, with respect to the alleged extrajudicial execution of Diana Maidanic, Laura Raggio Odizzio, and Silvia Reyes, the Commission considers that the petition tends to establish violations of the rights contained in Articles I (right to personal security), IX (right to inviolability of the home), and XVII (right to recognition of juridical personality and civil rights) of the American Declaration, as they died before April 19, 1985. VI. CONCLUSIONS 52. The Commission concludes that it is competent to examine the claims presented in this matter and that the petition is admissible under Articles 46 and 47 of the American Convention. Based on the arguments of facts and law set forth above, and without prejudging on the merits, THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS DECIDES: 1. To declare the instant case admissible in relation to the alleged violations of the rights recognized in Articles I, IX, XVII, XVIII, and XXV of the American Declaration, Articles 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 25 in relation to Articles 1(1) and 2 of the American Convention, Articles I, III, IV, V, and XI of the Inter-American Convention on Forced Disappearance of Persons, and Articles 1, 6, and 8 of the Inter-American Convention to Prevent and Punish Torture, with respect to Oscar Tassino Asteazu and Luis Eduardo González González; the rights recognized in Articles I, IX, and XVII of the American Declaration with respect to Diana Maidanic, Laura Raggio Odizzio, and Silvia Reyes; and at Articles I and XVIII of the American Declaration, Articles 5, 8, and 25, in relation to Articles 1(1) and 2 of the American Convention, and Articles I, III, IV, V, and XI of the Inter-American Convention on Forced Disappearance of Persons, and Articles 1, 6, and 8 of the Inter-American Convention to Prevent and Punish Torture, with respect to the alleged victims’ next-of-kin. 2. To declare inadmissible the instant case in relation to the alleged violations of the rights contained in Article 13 of the American Convention. 3. To notify the parties of this decision. 4. To proceed with the analysis on the merits. 5. Assembly. To make this report public and to publish it in its Annual Report to the OAS General