-5- b) Regarding publication of the Judgment on the State’s official web site, Nicaragua has also complied with this measure; c) Regarding the duty to publicize, via broadcast by a radio station with a large coverage area in the Atlantic Coast, section VII (Proven Facts), certain paragraphs of sections IX and X, and the operative paragraphs of the Judgment in Spanish, Miskito, Sumo, Rama and English, at least four times at intervals of two weeks, the representatives only verified that a portion of the Judgment was broadcast in Puerto Cabezas by Radio Caribe, both in Miskito and English. They requested that the State indicate the dates and times on which the relevant portions of the Judgment were broadcast by the other specified radio stations, and that it state whether the remaining three broadcasts and the relevant broadcast in Rama were actually performed; d) Regarding the creation of a simple, fast and effective judicial remedy to review any decisions of the Supreme Elections Council that may affect human rights, and repeal any provisions preventing said remedy from being pursued, as well as the duty to amend Elections Law No. 331 of 2000, they have no information on the draft bill for the amendment of the Elections Law referred to by the State. They stated that, even though at the March 23, 2006 meeting YATAMA’s representatives did in fact undertake to submit a draft amendment, they made a point of the fact that they required legal assistance therefor, which assistance has not been provided. They further noted that the electoral reform is the exclusive responsibility of the State. It is their view that, if the State does in fact have a draft ready, such draft could be submitted to YATAMA's members for their consideration; and e) Regarding the amounts due on account of pecuniary damage, nonpecuniary damage, costs and expenses, the State has not yet effected such payments. 6. The brief of October 16, 2006 whereby, after securing a deadline extension from the President, the Inter-American Commission submitted its observations to the State’s report. Basically, it stated that: a) Regarding the duty to publish section VII (Proven Facts), the required paragraphs from sections IX and X, and the operative paragraphs of the Judgment at least once, such text was published in La Gaceta, the State’s Official Gazette, and in the La Prensa newspaper; b) Regarding publication of the Judgment on the State’s official web site, the Judgment has been available on the Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ web site since October 3, 2005; c) Regarding the duty to publicize, via broadcast by a radio station with a large coverage area in the Atlantic Coast, section VII (Proven Facts), certain paragraphs from sections IX and X and the operative paragraphs of the Judgment in Spanish, Miskito, Sumo, Rama and English, at least four times at intervals of two weeks, the broadcasting of said paragraphs in Rama is still pending, and this obligation has thus been only partially complied with;