the reasons and circumstances in which these aberrant acts were committed, in order to design and implement measures of non-repetition252. 264. Taking into account all of the foregoing, more than 25 years after the events occurred the Commission has verified that the results of the investigation are very meager and both the victims and Argentine society know little about what happened in the attack on the AMIA and even less with regard to those responsible for such a serious act. Even more serious, the Commission has already pointed out that it has been the state's own action that has contributed to the generation of multiple factors of impunity, among which are a number of shortcomings, irregularities, delays, irrational abandonment of certain logical lines of investigation, creation of lines of investigation outside the law and without supporting evidence that have diverted the investigation for years and, finally, the establishment of investigative hypotheses of great factual fragility since they are not the result of a diligent and exhaustive investigation. 265. Consequently, the Commission will conclude that the State of Argentina is responsible for the violation of the rights to a fair trial and judicial protection enshrined in Articles 8 and 25 of the American Convention in relation to Article 1.1 thereof. c. i) Investigations initiated into the cover-up of the attack Investigation of the irregularities committed during the investigation conducted by the Federal Criminal Court No. 9 266. As of August 2000, a series of judicial proceedings were initiated to determine possible criminal responsibilities for the irregularities that would have been committed during the investigatory phase led by the Federal Criminal Investigation Court No. 9253. 267. Likewise, the Federal Oral Court No. 3, in its judgment dated October 29, 2004, considered the events related to the payment to Telleldín to be proven and, consequently, annulled all the actions taken by Judge Galeano during the investigatory phase and acquitted the Buenos Aires police officers under trial. The Court ordered that copies of the proceedings be extracted in order to investigate the possible criminal responsibility of Judge Galeano, of the prosecutors involved in the investigatory phase, of various officials of the National Executive Power, of the SIDE, of the Federal Police, judicial employees, of some of the national legislators who made up the Bicameral Monitoring Commission, and of certain defense attorneys who had acted in the casefile254. 268. The processes for the cover-up were divided into two sections: on the one hand, the one whose procedural object was to pay Telleldín with reserved funds from the SIDE to build an accusatory hypothesis that did not reflect the truth of what happened and, second, an investigation into whether public officials had blocked the continuation of the so-called "Syrian / Kanoore Edul lead". 269. Regarding the line of investigation for the payment to Telleldín, the Federal Criminal and Correctional Court No. 4 issued on September 19, 2006 an indictment against former judge Galeano for the crimes of embezzlement, coercion, ideological falsehood, illegitimate deprivation of liberty, and prevarication. Likewise, other people, including former SIDE agents, were prosecuted for the crime of embezzlement 255. On June 29, 2007, the Federal Criminal and Correctional Appeals Chamber confirmed the decision. IACHR. Right to the Truth in the Americas. OEA / Ser.L / V / II.152 Doc. 2 August 13, 2014 Original: Spanish. Para. 13 to 16; I/A Court H.R., Case of Peasant Community of Santa Barbara v. Peru. Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations, and Costs. Judgment of September 1, 2015. Series C No. 299, para. 262 to 265; United Nations. Human rights Commission. Updated Set of principles for the protection and promotion of human rights through action to combat impunity. E/CN.4/2005/102/Add.1 February 8, 2005. Principles 2 to 5. 253 Annex 1 Grossman Report, pas 94 and 95. Annex 5 to the petitioner's communication dated November 11, 2019. 254 Annex 2. Judgment of the TOF 3. Chapter V, pages 4810 to 4819. Annex 1 to the petitioner’s communication dated November 11, 2019. 255 Annex 14. Indictment issued by the Federal Criminal Investigation Court No. 4 dated September 19, 2006. Annex 5 to the petitioner's communication dated October 31, 2014. 252 52