criminal proceedings for the State to fulfill it obligation. Failure of these investigations cannot be attributed to lack of cooperation by the victims who have not appeared as plaintiffs (“partie civile”) as it has been proven that they did not have that possibility in the military criminal proceeding of 1991. Even though in 1994 the Constitutional Court ordered in another case that civil parties be admitted, this was not always complied with in military criminal proceedings. Furthermore, there was a lack of trust and credibility in Colombian criminal justice, and in several cases the next of kin did not have sufficient resources to participate; c) arbitrary statements by State Agents, before local and national public opinion, that five of the victims were guerrilla fighters, were never corrected, despite what was set forth in the judgments by administrative-law courts regarding their personal conditions; d) in this case the judgment cannot per se constitute sufficient reparation, for which reason the State must make public its acknowledgment of responsibility and restore the good name of the victims, by means of a writ of satisfaction drafted by the next of kin of the victims and signed by the President of the Republic, in one page of two national-coverage daily newspapers, as well as on radio and television, no later than thirty days after the judgment on reparations has been notified. The State must abstain from stating that Hernán Lizcano Jacanamijoy was a guerrilla fighter, and it must carry out actions to reinstate his good name; e) with the aim of honoring the memory of the victims and to reestablish their good name, they request that the State comply with the following measures, within six months of the date when the judgment on reparations is notified: e.i) to allocate the resources required to provide the school located in the town of Las Palmeras the infrastructure and human as well as material resources for it to adequately cover the primary education needs of children of the neighboring villages, in such a manner that each of the classrooms or play areas built bear the name of each of the victims; e.ii) to give the name of the victims to the school in the Municipality of Mocoa; and e.iii) to establish a formal or musical education center in the city of Bogotá, giving it the name of the victims. Arguments of the Commission 63. The Commission, in turn, asked the Court to order the State to comply with the following measures of reparation: a) to complete the investigation for violations addressed in the instant case in a serious, expedite, impartial, and effective manner, to establish the individual responsibility of its Agents and to apply the corresponding criminal and administrative sanctions. Full compliance with this aspect of the judgment of the Court is important both for the next of kin of the victims and